btbt

joined 5 years ago
[–] btbt@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

If something, be it labor or a product of some sort, has “use value”, that means that the benefit it provides is tangible and that said benefit is enjoyed mostly by the person who possesses the product or does the work that has value. An example of a “use value” product could be the home that a person lives in, while an example of “use value” labor could be the act of making a meal for oneself. In both of these cases, the commodity, that being the house in the former and the person’s work in the latter, are beneficial to the person possessing or producing them specifically because they are being directly used by that person for a clear purpose like shelter or nutrition.

On the other hand, if a commodity has “exchange value”, that means it’s primary benefit is found in the possibility that it can be exchanged for something else, which is generally money under capitalism, rather than being directly beneficial itself. A house owned by a landlord who lives elsewhere is a good example of a commodity that has “exchange value” because its value to the landlord comes from their ability to rent it to someone who needs housing in exchange for money, since the landlord isn’t using it to house themselves. The topic of the above quote, “exchange value” labor, works somewhat similarly. Contrary to “use value” labor, which is performed to provide something useful for the person performing it, “exchange value” labor is performed for the sake of being traded for something of use to the person performing it. For instance, a cook working in a restaurant is performing “exchange value” labor, because they’re making meals in exchange for receiving the money they’ll use to satisfy their own needs from the restaurant’s owner rather than making meals for their own consumption. In other words, they’re giving, or “selling”, the value that comes from their labor to someone else.

In the quote, Marx is saying that, because “exchange value” labor has become much more prominent than “use value” labor, people have mostly stopped being able to work solely for their own sustenance. Since labor has become a commodity similar to any other product, the benefits and opportunities associated with “use value” labor have been stifled by capitalists, or the people who control the resources which humans need to survive, because capitalists stand to gain more from using labor for its newfound purpose by purchasing the labor of others, the fruits of which are sold back to labourers as consumer products, in exchange for offering workers access to said resources in the form of money. The fact that working to provide for oneself has become untenable because of capitalism has made people reliant on other people or outside institutions to survive, compelling workers to migrate in order to be in proximity to these external forces, since this proximity allows them to offer their labor to said forces more easily. These migrations can take the form of people leaving their homes to go to their places of work, as explained by ChaosMaterialist, but it also takes the form of people congregating in areas where they will have more opportunities to sell their labor, often large cities, or, more recently, foreign countries where there is a higher demand for their skill set than there is in the country they originate from.

In short, capitalism and its transformation of labor into something performed for the benefit of capitalists as opposed to the benefit of oneself have caused the massive amount of urbanization and immigration we see across the globe today.

[–] btbt@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You know the situation is bad when an MF Doom fan can say that another fan base is too white and be completely justified in saying it lmao

[–] btbt@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Il y’a beaucoup de gens ici qui se moquent de l’autrice, mais en sa défense, c’est difficile d’écrire quelque chose qui a de l’allure sur le monde contemporain si t’es trop occupé à sucer Arnault pour observer ce qui s’y passe de temps en temps

[–] btbt@hexbear.net 27 points 2 years ago

That scenario and playing burgers are the only times when using stockfish for help is justified imo

[–] btbt@hexbear.net 50 points 2 years ago

In, and I cannot emphasize this enough, shallah

[–] btbt@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Don’t feel too bad for the Israelis, at least they got to live out their dreams and fill out what they imagined as their peoples destiny by stealing other peoples homes so that they could get the opportunity to get skin cancer or have a heat stroke

[–] btbt@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago

Reminds me of that one meme where the concentration camp survivor is called the “real Nazi” because they were holding an actual Nazi hostage at gunpoint after being liberated from the oppression carried out by said Nazi

[–] btbt@hexbear.net 48 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

How could free parking do this obama-sad

[–] btbt@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago

Greatest sports name in history, RIP to an absolute legend

[–] btbt@hexbear.net 29 points 2 years ago

Awwww cmon he just wanted to commit a little genocide as a treat you guyz it was 80 years ago why can’t you leave him alone and forgive him for his war crimes

[–] btbt@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] btbt@hexbear.net 59 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Imagine being such a loser that you think Joseph Robinette Biden’s biggest weakness is that his policies are too aggressive

view more: ‹ prev next ›