Oh, I didn't realize naked butts as part of full-height bottomless illustrations were SFW. Did I miss some explicit rules? My last in-office workplace would not put up with this as cube art, and my last workplace wouldn't appreciate this in any of the group chats.
I don't really care that much, but this feels over the line to me.
Probably should be tagged NSFW, yeah?
It's an older meme sir, but it checks out.
That's not what happened: https://www.snopes.com/news/2022/04/26/elon-musk-hunger/
He's bad, even among billionaires, so we don't have to make up (or even sensationalize) how/when he fails to be a good person.
What? The green revolution doesn't deserve anti-aircraft capabily?
Ho, ho, ho. Ho.
This Santa has one extra.
(j/k)
If it is not literally everyone, it still might be correct in the way that using a word for (one of) its jargon meaning(s) is correct. So, correct in context.
When using words to convey information to an audience to whom you might not be able to clarify, it is useful to use words for the meanings listed in common dictionar(y/ies) ("correctly") so that the audience can resolve confusions through those dictionaries.
If you win with the kid that killed both his parents in your party you get: BAD END
A decades long double blind controlled study is FAR beyond the GRAS standard that requiring it would stifle not only commerce but also science in general.
That's why sometimes we don't see bad effects in food until decades later.
I was using the infosec.pub instance from Friefox-ESR. Also, I was using the cross-post feature and it just reuses the URL from the other post. I will try to better in the future.
Just watch Arcane again.
That's the worst vitiligo I've ever seen! Oh, just yoga pants.
Uncle Ruckus does not approve.