Or that energy could be used for more productive things instead of being wasted on this shit.
breecher
None of your examples are examples of what it is good for, since they can all be done by other means.
Lots of cults, probably most of them, exists far beyond the ten years range unfortunately.
That's the way it is in a lot of European countries. Every single acre of land would be a gravesite if not for this system.
So it was gen z who did it then.
Do you not listen to yourself how moronic that argument is?
OP is regurgitating oligarch deflection. Oligarchs did this, age is completely irrelevant in this connection, and there will continue to be oligarchs in every single generation, unless something is done about it.
Yes, AI is sucking up all the immediate term cheap fossil-fuel energy while it can. But it needs more, so it’s driving carbon-free investment.
Nah, this is the same nonsense lie cryptobros tried to peddle. Any energy used by AI is energy which could have been used for something more worthwhile, carbon-free or not. And most of it is far from carbon-free.
He is not the only nazi in existence unfortunately.
Reviving the Epstein parties.
I don't know what any of that that means, but I was paraphrasing Sartre:
Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”
By "anti-Semites" Sartre is of course referring to the Nazis and their sympathisers (it was written in 1944).
They already use gender, sexuality, nationality, anything really. Race is just one of many strings on the harp of bigotry.
Who are you talking to? What are you talking about?
Did you wander into the wrong thread?