The control in both these examples comes from the human. Who should be smart enough not to keep weapons or tigers in a house. That decision is available to everyone. Unless your intention is to maim or kill. Then it makes sense.
boogetyboo
I mean you can be as obtuse as you like. If that comforts you.
A car can be used to maim and kill. But its main use is transport. Try again.
I saw this while drinking miso soup in 27°c dry heat. It's a weird feeling.
That's the problem. I don't think it's possible to be responsible and own a firearm.
I wouldn't keep a tiger in my house. I don't care if dad bequeathed it to me, or I totally have a lock on the door, or it's ok, I've done a tiger training course. Why invite the risk? Because I really fucking like tigers? Fuck everyone else, I like tigers.
What are valid reasons to keep something designed to maim and kill in your home?
I do not understand how a parent can be so irresponsible as to keep a weapon designed only to maim or kill in their house with their children.
To add to this, block users too. The community is so small here that you start to recognise names of annoying people and trolls. I'm all for a robust discussion, but if I know someone is always going to argue in bad faith or they're literally here just to stir shit, it's just easier to block them. Didn't really work with Reddit, but here it's got a decent impact.
Uh one correction, Tate rapes.
Who throws out a plant
You were meant to be disgusted. That's the point.
Why do you have firearms?