The IT guy wasn't a trainee; the trainee is the one who noticed him.
boatswain
There's a typo in your headline; you probably mean "a world when... were still valid" rather than "before".
The interesting thing here is that to maintain a trademark, you have to defend it, or you lose it. I'd think that would mean he's going to have to get litigious and start suing anything that looks like it violates his trademarks.
While Snowflake is a pretty cool and worthwhile extension to run, I don't think having a proxied connection to Tor will help Iranians if they just don't have an Internet connection at all.
Gotcha, that makes sense to me; cheers.
I am, yeah. Like I say, I'm just not understanding what they're suggesting Cloudflare should be doing differently in this case, other than not invoking Vance and Musk (which granted is pretty gross to do).
So your argument is that one of the biggest DNS resolvers should just bow to censorship imposed by a single nation? I'm not really getting what you think they should be doing about Italy's demand. Are you saying they should just pay the fines and keep doing business there?
It reads to me like they're being responsible and not bowing to censorship; seems very similar to PornHub's approach to age verification laws. What would be a better course of action here, in your view?
It seems like open and shut false advertising. Why is it ok? Retailers should face the consequences of their actions.
Who wants a stadium, though? Those things are a blight.
Sounds very Zen; thanks for sharing
I get it, but if bigger projects don't move to alternatives, those alternatives have a lot less pressure to evolve. If a big project bites the bullet and moves, then there are more technically minded folks with a vested interest in making the platform better.