I imagine it would use piles instead of bases.
boCash
Because that would require a modicum of critical reasoning and the willingness to occasionally and ever-so-slightly sacrifice for the benefit of others.
Just remember that the group you're describing are conservatives first and foremost. Christianity and the GOP are just their current excuses for their selfishness.
I hate to break it to you bub, but it appears that you don't speak English either.
I'm no expert, but I'd guess that you're running into a lot of sport-related results because I assume fencing is the name of the sport and not just the one-handed fighting style. I also think that's going to become a hard line to draw, since there's no referee on a battlefield to blow the whistle when someone suddenly uses their free hand to add a little force to a blow.
So it depends. Where's the single combat occurring? On a ship? Axes are great for boarding action as well as chopping rope. Inside a castle or on city streets? A short blade will be better than a long one. In an open field? Why bother with one weapon held in a single hand? Oh, because it's a duel at sunrise? Well, now we're basically back to fencing; combat with defined parameters.
Me. It was a different world 15 years ago though.
/> born to shit
/> forced to wipe
Sir, this is a Lemmy
le epic lemming
this
ok boomer
ok boomer
That's absurd. You don't need to route to or from your router. That's it's entire job. Do you also run computations for your computer and speak on behalf of your speaker? Complete madness.