His complaint seriously backfired here, because it makes working on a chalkboard sound epic. The act of rubbing one rock against another becomes ascendance into the highest realms of thought? That's fuckin' alchemy, bro.
Too lazy even to make a "keikaku means nonconsensual" joke. Tsk, tsk.
spoiler: it's just a shell script that repeats "Anta baka?!"
One thing that would be a good addition to the recommended NSFW reading list would be an explanation of basic CS theory that's good enough to forestall the worst of the woo, or at least give a reader who isn't already a lost cause the tools to recognize the woo.
Those nitpicks are something you can ask it to clarify! Wikipedia doesn’t do that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk
Those nitpicks are something you can ask it to clarify! Wikipedia doesn’t do that. If you are looking for something specific and it’s not in the Wikipedia article - tough luck, have fun digging through different articles or book excerpts to piece the missing pieces together.
Or, as we called it in my day, studying.
"The image of the penis is translated into a depth measurement...."
That's numberwang!
(thinks)
Cum Jabbar
Wikipedia's coverage of math and science topics is... uneven, but that article looks to be on the decent side. It's good enough that if you say you got absolutely nothing from it, I'd be inclined to blame your study skills before I blamed the article. And guess what? Pressing the lever to get nuggets of extruded math-substitute product will not help you develop those study skills.
Huh. Too bad he and I will probably never meet; this sounds like an instance where my ability to be incredibly abrasive could be used for good. (Or at least for comedy.)
Mad research skills: