Bio people here are poorly informed. Just in general some of the presentations are factually incorrect
B-but rationalists are experts at covalent bonds
Also meeting people.... as a woman I have never felt as ignored and disrespected as I have in some instances the pa...
I'm sure the feedback becomes more positive in the cut-off part, no doubt about it
More-crap-ter Projection
Yeah, that juxtaposition makes no sense to me. How does the machine that remixes existing text and makes it worse become anything that can "recursively self-improve"? Show your work.
Technical terms can still be, technically speaking, dumb as fuck.
My "I have no specific views on eugenics" T-shirt has prompted many questions already answered by my T-shirt
You are not worth responding to. Goodbye.
There is a way of seeing the world where you look at a blade of grass and see "a solar-powered self-replicating factory". I've never figured out how to explain how hard a superintelligence can hit us, to someone who does not see from that angle. It's not just the one fact.
It's almost as if basing an entire worldview upon a literal reading of metaphors in grade-school science books and whatever Carl Sagan said just after "these edibles ain't shit" is, I dunno, bad?
Making an analogy to something more familiar, or to anything that actually happens in real life, is too pedestrian for a true visionary.
(It's just a guess on my part, but given the extent to which conspiracy theorists are all marinating in a common miasma these days, I'd expect that a 9/11 twoofer would be more likely to deny relativity for being "Jewish physics".)
whomst among us has'nt err'd?
"Pronouns" with a hard R