blakestacey

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I think of myself as playing the role of a wise old mentor who has had lots of experience, telling stories to the young adventurers, trying to toughen them up, somewhat similar to how Prof Quirrell[8] toughens up the students in HPMOR through teaching them Defense Against the Dark Arts

[8] Note that during our conversation, Emerson brought up HPMOR and the Quirrell similarity, not me.

epistemic status: jesus fucking christ, what is your major malfunction?!

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 1 points 2 years ago

Whom the gods would destroy, they first make Barbie.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Suppose you say that you’re 99.99% confident that 2 + 2 = 4.

Then you're a dillbrain.

Then you have just asserted that you could make 10,000 independent statements, in which you repose equal confidence, and be wrong, on average, around once. Maybe for 2 + 2 = 4 this extraordinary degree of confidence would be possible

Yes, how extraordinary that I can say every day that the guy in front of me at the bodega won't win the Powerball. Or that [SystemRandom().random() >= 0.9999 for i in range(10000)] makes a list that is False in all but one spot.

P(x|y) is defined as P(x,y)/P(y). P(A|A) is defined as P(A,A)/P(A) = P(A)/P(A) = 1. The ratio of these two probabilities may be 1, but I deny that there's any actual probability that's equal to 1. P(|) is a mere notational convenience, nothing more.

No, you kneebiter.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 3 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I didn't expect that the repetition of a banal yet occasionally useful saying like "the map is not the territory" could make a person deserve being shoved into a locker, but life will surprise us all.

Mixed in with the rank, fetid ego are amusing indications that Yud gave very little thought to what Bayesian probability actually means. I find that entertaining.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 1 points 2 years ago

I got as far as this blog post that I shared in the first days of new!SneerClub, but that was only a first stab.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I've more than once been tempted to write Everything the Sequences Get Wrong about Quantum Mechanics, but the challenge is doing so in a way that doesn't just amount to teaching a whole course in quantum mechanics. The short-short version is that it's lazy, superficial takes on top of cult shit — Yud trying to convince the reader that the physics profession is broken and his way is superior.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's an old creationist ploy. DNA is like a computer program, which implies there must have been a programmer, yadda yadda, just asking questions, wharblgarbl, brave scientists are speaking up and challenging the Darwinist regime.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 2 points 2 years ago

Found here:

This is the secret. George opened the debate by acknowledging Yud's intellectual gigantism, comparing him to Sartre and Neechay (have not heard of this one before). "I'm sitting in front of an intellectual giant now" Game recognize game.

And here, bringing the Alabama-school-board energy:

Evolution is observable, we know species change. Evolution by natural selection is marginally observable. We can run experiments in test tubes with bacteria or whatever. Yet we confidently extrapolate these extremely limited observations to the vastly bigger phenomenon 🤔🤔

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 2 points 2 years ago

Calling your own mewling drivel "Programmer Theory" is an A+ dipshit move.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 2 points 2 years ago

Artificial Intelligence, noun: a technology which, at great expense, finally allows computers to be bad at math

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 1 points 2 years ago

"Urbit" sounds like a failed grocery-delivery service.

view more: ‹ prev next ›