blakestacey

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 13 points 2 years ago

hey hey I'm P(doom) and I'm here to say / MIRI needs cash so tithe your pay / Basilisk comes by night or day / so atheists reinvent how to pray

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 10 points 2 years ago

But Silicon Valley thinks we’re all overregulation-loving authoritarian communist bureaucrats.

[citation needed]

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

I'm disappointed that they never (to my knowledge) tried to justify the purchase by saying they needed a castle to build a fortified base that would be safe against marauders in the event of civilizational collapse. The return on investment for keeping a catastrophic failure from becoming an existential one is (handwave, handwave) at least 10^69.

"We need a castle for Isaac Asimov's Foundation Beyond Thunderdome" would, at least, be on brand.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 12 points 2 years ago

It's not even "GIGO" with these people. "Garbage In, Garbage Out" implies that the process between input and output is legitimate at least. They're not trying to make justifiable decisions in the face of incomplete information, or detect inconsistencies among their own beliefs, or anything of the sort. They're just emitting math-shaped noises to bolster their own egos and further insulate their cult. They use language nominally about changing one's beliefs in order to keep their own beliefs locked in place.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

These guys use "entropy" the way that people trying to sell you healing crystals use "quantum".

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There is a fractal optimization algorithm that created life, intelligence, and every meta-organism we know.

I'm wanking at the speed of light / wanna make a meta-fractal brain out of you

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I think that's it — it's the one Timnit Gebru linked to back in February which prompted the old!SneerClub discussion I mentioned, and Molly White's newsletter links to the same place.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 4 points 2 years ago (9 children)

A link to what?

(The link in the Substack post is to the Wikipedia page for the Crooks result, disguising — intentionally or not — the fact that the writer is just smashing together science words.)

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 10 points 2 years ago (11 children)

For example, the inaugural Substack post defining effective accelerationisms’s “principles and tenets” name-drops the “Jarzynski-Crooks fluctuation dissipation theorem”

To echo a comment from old!SneerClub: That's not a thing. There are three separate but related ideas (the Crooks fluctuation theorem, the Jarzynski equality and the fluctuation-dissipation theorem) which the author doesn't know are separate, because he hasn't a clue what he's talking about.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 7 points 2 years ago

They have muscles you wouldn't know about in Canada

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We're not bothered. We're bored. Off you go now.

view more: ‹ prev next ›