blaine

joined 2 years ago
[–] blaine@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (11 children)

Twitter didn't say they had government appointed staff. They said they were "state affiliated". Which you just confirmed as 100% true.

[–] blaine@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

What if it's a sailing yacht, powered by wind and solar?

[–] blaine@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Same here. I think I'll just cancel and install SmartTube on all of my Chromecasts.

[–] blaine@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Same here, but I'm locked in at $7.99

[–] blaine@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Not only does this bill not have anything to do with searches or seizures by the government, it goes out of its way not to require cloud providers to perform any searches of their own. Where are you seeing a 4th amendment violation?

[–] blaine@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

Except there are specific exclusions in the bill to address this. Hell, the three paragraphs before the one mentioning "deliberately blinding" are all dedicated to explaining why it doesn't apply to end-to-end encryption.

[–] blaine@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The only way you could think this bill targets end-to-end encryption is if you only read the terrible headline and didn't bother to read the actual bill. Before you freak out about paragraph 4, be sure to look at paragraphs 1-3.

[–] blaine@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

I don't know how anyone can say that Star Wars has more lore than Star Trek. They both have about the same number of movies and books, but Star Trek has hundreds more episodes of TV to expand the lore even further.

[–] blaine@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Am I the only one who saw Prigojak?

[–] blaine@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What is asian chao? Do they possibly mean "chow" as in a restaurant?

[–] blaine@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

There are one or two fairly sizable differences from what I can see.

view more: ‹ prev next ›