Is what true? The data? The projection? (that's not true or false, it's an estimate of what may happen) The post headline is not accurate; if you read the article you'll see it doesn't claim 1 in 3 will get COVID, it makes a projection that as many as 1 in 3 may get it. So it sounds like 1 in 3 is the upper end of the range of the projection.
blackbrook
joined 2 years ago
Oh the irony of hitting a paywall for this...
Um, would you put on these white gloves and talk in a high voice?
Check out JOOQ.
They forgot, "...though dumber and less competent."
Does any of that explain the 404? An even 400ml is very close to 14 imperial ounces. 14.078. 404 makes it further off and a weird number in any units I've tried coverting it to.
How that is any kind of breakthrough that gets us closer to a cure mystifies me. It just says these previously unexplained cases can also now be explained by what was already known to be the major cause. Am I missing something?
Yes, and it's particularly obnoxious when they seem to have twisted a quote as an excuse for this: '"This was absolutely stunning to watch first-hand," said materials scientist Brad Boyc.' I'm pretty sure that use of the word means "beautiful", not "shocking."
Yotten
Short term boom, long term bust.
Is that beard to make him look younger? Because it looks like that beard you sometimes see on young guys figuring out that they can't really grow a decent beard...
You realize the world is full of people and organizations with many different opinions and interests, don't you? It is impossible for anyone to do anything, or fail to do anything without people being unhappy and critical about it. The bigger and more powerful you are the louder that will be. There should be nothing surprising about this.