blackbrook

Maybe they are the same in your accent and different in mine? Speech be funny that way.

I usually hear twot / twaht.

Do the candy corns melt into the pizza?

The way you used pronouns, 'they' and then 'we', suggests you are asking if they become a new person in the eyes of us who haven't died. Is that really what you meant?

It's usually the influence of the Darkness that prompts people to put hotdogs in a toaster. Don't listen to what it tells you about the bathtub either.

I don't classify ideas in my head into those two categories like that. They are all beliefs. I have a sense of how confident I am of each idea. Like how surprised I would be if they were proved wrong. And I try to maintain awareness of why I have that confidence, like other beliefs that support it, evidence, etc.

That's imperfect, like I can't claim that there aren't ideas that, if challenged, I'd think about what my supporting evidence is and come up with bupkis. Anything is up for doubt and reevaluation.

I feel pretty strongly that this is the right approach, and that people failing to have a similar approach is a serious problem in the world.

Restoring that sounds like a great idea, but I'm afraid we're going to need an ocean that's not too acidic for calcium carbonate shell formation.

The Executioner's Song

"Peculiarities" has a much different connotation. I've used software which has had features that might have been better described as peculiarities.

Being questionable is a property of being human.

The hard thing is to actually get past their lizard brain and contact their logical brain.

I can't imagine myself in a relationship with someone who identifies with any ideology so strongly they define themselves as that.