bitsplease

joined 2 years ago
[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Incopentence from the dev, malice from the company too cheap to hire actual talent

[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

Bet money that man had a beer gut lol

[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

This recurring bit was one of my favorite parts of the comic lol

[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

I actually just replayed it recently for the first time since around release (I don't fuck with GTA:O) and I've got to say, it holds up really fucking well

[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 years ago

Pretty much everything Google makes exists solely to power it's ad service - including it's search engine. That's literally their whole business. Did anyone think that Google was building browsers just as a fun weekend project?

[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How can you expect the numbers to work for building owners?

Because it's either take those numbers or get even less? I'm sure the commercial property owners would prefer to just keep renting out at commercial rates and make more $$$ (plus I'm sure commercial tenants are less hassle than residents overall), but right now a lot of these buildings are sitting empty.

Better to make something than nothing

[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Are you arguing it's inaccurate? Because it's on video

Are you arguing it's unimportant? Because even if you think the question was unimportant, the group reaction to a question they didn't like was absurdly undignified for a group of our nations leaders

Are you arguing that their reaction was appropriate? Because I fail to see how a question asking for clarification on the new house speakers involvement in an attempt to undermined a democratic election is worthy of being booed and told to "shut up"

Seriously, beyond "I don't like it" or "it makes us look bad", what exactly is your issue with the article or it's subject?

Edit: lol, looks like the pussy literally made a throwaway to post their comment. You know your political beliefs are solid when you're terrified to have them associated with you in any way lol

[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago

That really just furthers the point that we need UBI in my mind.

The people who are making today more or less the same as what the UBI would be would have their income doubled overnight. And yeah, some will say fuck it and quit their jobs to just lounge around (though I imagine many will go back, ask anyone whose been out of work for a long time, it gets boring quicker than you might think), but I'd wager most will take that double income and run with it. Twice your takehome would be life changing for just about everybody. Hell, those who continue to work will probably wind up with more than double, because demand for those jobs will go up.

Jobs that are unpleasant or difficult will basically start actually getting paid what they're worth, because no one will be stuck in a "I have to do this or starve" situation.

And yes, the overall GDP probably will take a hit, because we won't be working our population to death, but productivity has skyrocketed over the last century, it's about time we start putting that fact to work for the actual people, instead of using it to extract record profits for the top 1%.

TL;DR - People will still work because working will still mean more money. Some won't, but that's fine. If jobs are having a hard time being filled, then employers will simply have to pay more to get them done, or explore ways to automate the parts people don't want to do

[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Which would also kickoff a fun side quest of finding a buyer, since the most expensive magical item in existence isn't exactly something you can pawn off in a random towns general store lol

[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Not really. Basic income is - just that. Basic. It'll cover your necessities and put a roof over your head, but not much else

Id much rather continue working so that I can afford luxury items (my hobbies are as expensive as they are time consuming). I'd imagine most would feel the same.

Opponents of UBI all seem to have this bizarre notion that most people would be willing to take a big step down lifestyle wise to not have to work, but that doesn't mesh with how most people treat money.

How many people deliberately underemploy themselves just to have more free time, even if they could easily be making more money? Very few. And I'd wager that most in that category have lucrative enough careers that their "underemployed" is still making most people's normal income

[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 years ago

100%, id totally put my butt in the fake side if I were a smoker for laughs

[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago

My guess, they just wanted to see what would happen lol - sounds like the kind of dumb time killing activity I'd have done as a teen

view more: ‹ prev next ›