No. Normally the kernel doesn't get updated in the network during training. They are called hyper-parameters. They do affect training, but they are not updated by the training algorithm
bitfucker
joined 1 year ago
In the context of machine learning, usually a list of numbers that is arranged in a certain way, and is used for mathematical operation. You can think of it as a transfer/transform "function" that takes data as input, and spits out the representation of said data in some other way (that we usually don't know until the training is finished and we analyze the result)
Yeah, the difference is that this time an expert uses the tools as it should be. Not regular Joe feeding all the code with a prompt to "find a vulnerability". Even then, this is a coincidence. But this discovery means there exists (maybe) a strategy that can be tried to detect similar exploits.
For the kind of supported data, one looks at the README and it supports a lot of different kinds of metadata, hence the generic description. A jpeg (or other image) metadata editor cannot edit metadata for geospatial surveys for example. But this application can. And manage it like any other CRUD application works. By providing users a way to enter a new entry, edit it, remove it, query it, all kinds of things really.
Tl;dr, the tool is called Metadata Editor and released under MIT. As the name suggests, it helps manage metadata for data. Currently supported standard includes:
IPTC
ISO 19139
Dublin Core
DDI-CodeBook v2.5
"But officer, all of this media that I have is for AI purposes. I swear I did not read/listen/watch/play it for myself too!"
I prefer appwrite if I could choose. Check them out of you don't need all the bells and whistles of supabase
Maybe like Open Policy Agent (OPA) but with Yaml instead of Rego?
Isn't it to keep the copyright notice and not the license itself? I.e, you may redistribute it with a different license term and conditions but the copyright notice must be retained. I don't know how different it is tho in legal speak. Maybe they are equivalent.
I always see people with the argument that the developer labour is somehow being exploited. But have you never thought that maybe, just maybe, the person in question does not care? He just wanted to publish his creation and be done with it. He does not care if people are using it. That's my case. I don't care if people want to use my piece of cryptographic library. Just be aware that I am just some random dude, providing no support nor warranty. I make the library for my use cases and it works fine.
Pick a hardware to tinker with. I'd suggest a development kit rather than some cheap mcu-psu-downloader-only board. Now listen, it may be more on the expensive side, but you don't have to deal with hardware trouble first since many development board usually provide a lot of functionality to play with.
Second, check the official documentation for said devkit and play with it. You'll ended up immersing yourself on your selected manufacturer but that's fine for learning.
After you've more understanding of the workflow for embedded development, then I can safely advice you to start exploring. A simple one would be programming the same board but using a different workflow. You may ended up with the manufacturer IDE, and wondering how to get to your beloved editor for example. Then you start to learn the build workflow until download and debug step.