bitcrafter

joined 2 years ago
[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 2 points 1 hour ago

Ah, so just adding the irony of AWS not even using its own tools to prevent these kinds of mishaps.

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 1 points 3 hours ago

Sure, but the point is that he was supposedly paying AWS to have multiple backups in multiple regions, which he very carefully set up to maximize redundancy. If, at the end of the day, there is no actual redundancy because AWS itself is actually malicious insofar that it will delete all of your data for no good reason at all and then blame it on you, then they are being very dishonest about their product.

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 1 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

That sounds even more reasonable to me!

What does "CDK" refer to?

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 4 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

All of the diligence in the world on your end does not matter if, on the AWS end, the employees can and do delete all of your data via fat-fingering without involving you at all, which is what happened here.

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 8 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

I suspect that if this person had known that using AWS was putting all of their data within one wrong key press of being completely deleted without recovery, then they would have reconsidered using AWS.

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 18 points 14 hours ago

I cannot speak on behalf of the article author, but as someone who personally is an imbecile, the answer is: definitely!

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 12 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

On top of all the other horrors, am I the only one seriously bothered by the fact that every dry-run is just a single fat-finger away from deleting all of a customer's data across all of AWS? I know that whenever I design a script to do something as dangerous as this, at the very least the default behavior is for it to do a dry-run so that if you want it to actually go ahead and make the changes you have to pass in an additional argument such as --confirm-deletion; for something this dangerous and apparently irreversible, I would probably also prompt the user to type "IAMSURE" before proceeding.

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 15 points 15 hours ago

It would seem that Nix has succumbed in this case to its Archenemy.

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 2 points 16 hours ago

Drawing an analogy to a spouse trapped in an abusive relationship that you have simply told "to stop the fucking whining" is not helping you out as much as you seem to think that it is...

It is true that the last time I answered that question with, "I put something in their drink every morning to make them more chill," I did not end up landing that job...

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago

Sure, but if someone is more introverted, then, even if they have amazing social skills, they will have a much harder time forming social networks with a lot of reach because it takes more energy for them to do so, whereas it is a lot easier for a more extroverted person to do this.

 

I realized that I haven't spent time on Pixelfed in a while, and that it would be great to find more content to add to my feed! So I logged in to my instance (social.photo) and then... hit a wall.

With Lemmy and Mastadon, it is super easy to peek at what is going on at other instances and find communities to subscribe to, but it looks like Pixelfed does not make this easy. The biggest issue I have run into is that many of the largest servers do not seem to let you explore what is on them unless you first create an account, and the main Pixelfed Server Directory at https://pixelfed.org/servers does not indicate which servers can be explored or not, so you have to click a few times (since the link takes you to the registration page) to even find this out for a given server. It also does not help that navigating to an instance does not show you the content for that instance, like it does for Lemmy or Mastadon, but for a login page that may or may not have an "Explore" tab at the top.

Am I missing something here? I just logged into Tumblr for the first time in years and my immediate next thought was, "Gee, I should be using Pixelfed instead!" But if in practice it is simply not possible to find content I am interested in without a great deal of hassle then it is not a realistic replacement. In particular, it seems like the way Pixelfed is set up requires me to register on particular instances to get a better view of what content is available (not just locally, but pulled in from other instances). This seems contrary to me to one of the biggest advantages of the Fediverse, which is that you are able and encouraged to pick an instance that best suits you rather than the one where all of the content lives; in particular I could not imagine self-hosting a Pixelfed instance without being left out of most of the content available.

And just to be clear, I am willing to put up with some degree of hassle resulting from the inherently decentralized model of the Fediverse, since I switched completely over to Lemmy from Reddit about a year and a half ago after the API fiasco (and the only reason why I do not use Mastadon more is because I was never that into Twitter-style content to begin with). But having to go out of my way to get through artificially constructed walls to even find content to subscribe is a bit much.

However, again, maybe I am missing here. If someone is willing to point me to a resource that solves this problem problem and makes this entire rant sound completely ignorant then that would be great! 😀


Edit: Fixed silly typo.

 

Someone had to do this before the riots started.

view more: next ›