The same could be said for K-9. What more could you want from an email app.
biddy
Podcasts are just a RSS feed with an mp3 downloas link. It's trivial to open the RSS feed in your browser and locate the mp3 download link. Download the mp3, open it in any audio editor, edit out the ad. Or find the folder where your podcast app stores the mp3s and edit them from there.
Personally, I'm OK with podcast ads as there's limited opportunity for tracking or personalization. If we don't encorage podcasts to remain as an open platform, they will be swallowed up by Spotify.
If it's faster to get an AI to write your commit messages than to write them yourself, your commit messages are too long. They should be one sentence.
A single rail clamp would have a lot of friction because you need contact all the way around the wheel, increasing the surface area. The reason why regular train wheels are so efficient is because they're balanced on top on a tiny surface area, using the clever tapered shape of the wheels to go around corners without jamming against the side of the wheel.
Balancing on a single rail is practically impossible. However a common design for rail bikes is to have a normal bike on 1 rail with a detachable outrigger for balancing on the other rail. https://i2.wp.com/makezine.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/rail-bike-conversion.jpg?resize=1200%2C670&strip=all&ssl=1
Metal on metal is way more efficient than rubber on road. Imagine how awesome it would be zooming along a dis-used rail line at 50 on a modern version of this.
This is without mentioning the dickheads who drive at 40 everywhere
Is this 40 mi or km per hour? The UK seems to arbitrarily flip either way. Both are far too fast for a residential street.
But you're dismissing all the scientific evidence that proves that resurrection is impossible. Even assuming all the anecdotal evidence is accurate, which I'm happy to do if it's accepted by historians, the leap of logic from "some people 2000 years ago thought they saw a guy get executed then reappear a few days later, and they were surprised so they started a religion out of it" to "God is real" is unfathomable to me, and dismissed by any serious expert.
It's certainly a strange event in history and we can have a historical discussion about possible historical explanations. But this was originally a philosophical/theological discussion.
I find these discussions interesting. It's interesting to hear other people's world view, why they believe what they believe, and to have my world view challenged.
What part? There's nothing revealing about calling it anecdotal, all historical evidence for that time is.
I just don't think the anecdotal evidence is relevant to this discussion. The claims of Christianity are so great that it doesn't cut it for me.
I looked at it. It's a bunch of anecdotal evidence from 2000 years ago. Anecdotal evidence is well established to be extremely unreliable, people hallucinate all sorts of nonsense all the time. I couldn't find a justification for how any amount of anecdotal evidence can prove resurrection, which violates many scientifically proven theories.
Your argument is called Pascal's wager. My main objection is there's a lot of superstitions to try. If you want maximize the benefit of a strategy like you're describing, you have to worship every god of every religion, obey every limitation on what you can do in every religion, superstition or conspiracy, take every supposedly magical medicine, ect. They all seem equally unlikely, but they are all believed by someone and if true would have huge benefits, so by your logic I should follow all of them completely. Except by doing that I am sacrificing most of my life for the tiny possibility of a benefit, rather than making the most of the life I know I have.
5 year olds are pretty cringe