bennypr0fane

joined 2 years ago
[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There should be an income maximum. It should be a little above the maximum happiness threshold. Any income above that should be taxed at 95%

[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago (12 children)
[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 months ago

It's a bad example, because we are not monkeys, we lack zookeepers and money normally rots only at a much, much slower rate than oranges and increases itself over a certain threshold

[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 2 months ago (3 children)

If only it were that easy to cut down billionaires...

[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 months ago

*works in America where walls are actually hollow

[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

No programming language in the world can keep you from shooting yourself in the foot.

[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 months ago

Also, Start with backing up all the stuff you never backed up in the first place

[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 months ago (9 children)

If it works, it's not hybris, is it?

[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

Niemand? Keine Antwort?

[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What? Europe isn't a country?

[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago

Maybe the OOP just assumed it's "standard" for pretty and famous people they'd do all the things in the sack.

view more: ‹ prev next ›