baduhai

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

TachiJ2K is the fork that debuted bulk migration, and, while relatively inactive, it's technically still maintained. It's very much feature complete though, so I wouldn't much about it not being super maintained.

Personally, I've been using Yokai, it's basically J2K, but actively maintained and getting feature updates.

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'm partial towards bato.to. It used to be the aggregator before MangaDex came around, it even had ads and revenue share with the scanlators who uploaded there. Alas it eventually got a massive DMCA just like the MangaDex one, and combined with constant DDOSes and overall maintainer burnout, it died. It recently came back under different ownership and seems to be a very complete aggregator, which leans even harder on the piracy aspect, as it hosts official translations.

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago

Got it, thanks.

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I read that, but my question still stands.

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Not sure I entirely understand this, would this function as a replacement for the *arr stack?

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm allergic to subscriptions, but I might just consider it.

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz -2 points 2 months ago

What? The two things have nothing to do with each other. A GNU operating system doesn't need to be open source or have its source code available anywhere. A GNU operating system just means it uses GNU tools.

You could write a new kernel from scratch, never distribute a single character of the source code, make an operating system with your new kernel along with GNU tools, and even sell your operating system, which the GPL allows for. The GNU tools would still be open source, sure, but your operating system would be neither open source, nor have its source code completely available.

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz -1 points 2 months ago

Which means it isn't truly open source, just that the source code is available.

Don't get me wrong, I love that the source for TF2 is available, but it's not open source.

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 months ago

I've heard the term source available be used, though not sure how popular it is.

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz -2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You can follow whatever you think is best. I'll stick to and evangilise what I view to be the correct definition of open source.

Ubuntu is not FSF approved, and guess what, it's still a GNU operating system

What makes Ubuntu a GNU operating system isn't the fact that it's FSF approved, it's the fact that it uses GNU tools.

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Huh, I would like to see that.

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

No, those would not be open source.

Definition of Open Source: https://opensource.org/osd

view more: ‹ prev next ›