Other comments seems to suggest otherwise.
baconboy
joined 2 years ago
Who pays for Catbox?
Don’t be a fool, wrap your tool
Age verification is difficult and no amount of logins will prevent underage users from gaining access if they are actively seeking to.
You are arguing against a straw man.
Good luck with that.
Cool to know 🤘
Fully aware it’s unaffiliated, just that local settings was bad concept.
I definitely understand where you’re coming from, I was just attempting to debate cost/value.
I mean that’s not what I’m suggesting, but that’s kinda how the world works today.
Ideally you’d need a register of known hashes of material, but that’s not even enough either.
Proper fingerprinting would require a lot more processing power and a centralized source to vet against.
Super difficult topic tbh.
But I guess the moral is as always: don’t take pictures, or let anyone take pictures, that you don’t want to show to your parents or grandparents.
I mean since you brought up crypto I accept that as a given.
Just think that most people aren’t into crypto as much as those who are into crypto like to think.
Didn’t know GitHub sponsors was a thing.
Neat.
(Also: new sponsor).
If I can make one request (not that I feel you should be in any way honored to follow it up or prioritize it):
The local blur policy/implementation is horrible.
I want to just scroll through content. Everytime I log in I must update the settings.
http://wefwef.app doesn’t even give me an option to adjust it.
Then educate us instead of boasting and being negative…
Sharing knowledge > sharing opinions