still means they’re willing to collect data
azalty
joined 2 years ago
Un peu mais ça va
J'ai surtout été frustré que le perso fasse des choix aussi cons et s'en sorte bien
Trop courte à mon goût
Not FOSS and probably not privacy friendly
Proprietary bullshit
We'll see how it turns out, but yea they're in big trouble
I'm all for compensating, but obviously paying for the full work will never work
If not, AI is dead in the US
Technically, everything you write is copyrighted
To be fair, they’re not wrong. We need to find a legal comprise that satisfies everyone
Dozens? More.
Where is twitter mentioned?
Edit: Ooh for the giveaway! Well you’re free not to then. The rest of the post is about the swapping service, the giveaway is just a small part of it
You’re right, sorry. Wasn’t meant to be an insult, but more of a way to make you react and understand that we don’t understand
You're also saying something is shitty without justification.
The website's article completely bases itself on https://duke.hush.is/memos/6/
Both are spreading FUD about churning. The 2 wallets method is also churning, but "easy" version because you're separating the results. The end result is still dangerous: you could spend 2 of your "Outgoing" coins in the same transaction, which is really easy to identify, provided both coins are from the same source.
I'd argue the stastical risk of establishing a trace thanks to a serie of churns is extremely unlikely. Nobody will churn 6+ times anyways, and the advantages of churning far outweighs the ones of not churning.
Sadly, they also don't state anything about how that "MAP Decoder Attack" works. After searching, it's pretty interesting, and we come onto the pretty well known issue that decoy distribution isn't perfect.
FCMP will fix this. In the meantime, please churn for any sensitive transaction. Either method (2 wallets or classic churning) works and the effects are always good, even if other mistakes are made (except if sweeping all).
I have to say I haven't really checked much of Rucknium's work, but it's pretty damn precise. Guy knows what he's talking about. Our next big threat will be malicious remote nodes, like he said!