azalty

joined 2 years ago
[–] azalty@jlai.lu 1 points 6 months ago

Nice then, I was just worried about some hijacking of the subject by you saying « yes, but we made money! » :)

Good thing you can get something (more) out of it now then! Yea it’s difficult to sell those, I can relate

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 1 points 6 months ago

I do also think his mistake was posting under proton's account. He sided with trump on an issue because they had did great with it once. Whether he’s in the right or wrong, what now? If you do believe his intentions and just think he is dumb for believing that then 🤷

Proton and him have made wrong decisions. That won’t be the first one and that’s not the end of the world.

Some Trump supporters are not evil by default, they’re just too attracted to the business side, which make them forget about the ethical side. I guess you could say it makes them evil this way 🤷

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

A lot of people are unconditional fans of Steam and Valve but are pretty uneducated. They’ll defend Valve because they brought a lot of good in the community but will ignore all the negatives.

Valve does a great job on this by not responding to allegations and dramas, so people don’t learn the news.

Sorry it happened! Try again in another community and later. Word it correctly :) - you don’t care about « karma » here. Let’s educate more people :)

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

That’s partly because the kids that entered after yours lost a lot of money, and partly because some people gambled a lot, got addicted, and lost a ton of cash.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I’m talking about gambling, because you can sell the skins for real money with valve. There’s an expectation of a financial prize.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 2 points 7 months ago

Comment where? 🤔

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 44 points 7 months ago (13 children)

I thought it was because they made gambling open to minors and took 30% of all game sales

[–] azalty@jlai.lu -2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

They gave a more nuanced answer afterwards

[–] azalty@jlai.lu -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

All I see is a lemmy.world user being against a genocide, and a lemmings.world denying it.

They’re two different instances, and if anything it proves that lemmy.world isn’t totally like that

Defederating is censorship. Use it against innocents and you’re no better than them.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 2 points 7 months ago

Low moderation doesn’t mean they’re into that. You can find opposite opinions on the instance, which indicates to me that it is just not well moderated and pretty « free »

But after all I don’t really know about the debate, I just learned about that and saw your comment

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

You publish source and respect the rules, you get paid. Easy, right?

Yet you didn’t publish the source and didn’t respect the rules, so don’t complain you didn’t get paid.

view more: ‹ prev next ›