This is a poor fake. The "richest man in the world" has missing front teeth? Sure.
axx
It could also be, simply, that she's a lying bastard.
It's pretty clear from the few mentions of her positions in the article that she has at best a very superficial relationship with facts and the truth.
Non non non, ça ça ne compte pas, ça marche pas comme ça ! Cest la liberté de faire comme les autres et pas autrement (surtout quand mon industrie en dépend).
Kinda. They are better than most, but don't score that well on Ethical Consumer's grading. (I could look up why, if anyone's interested.)
And while they do offer free repair, which is wonderful and something i genuinely command them for doing, the results can be hit or miss. I had a pair of jeans with pretty standard areas worn out come back from a repair with a massive piece of mismatched denim covering almost the entire upper part of the pants. Unwearable. I ended up having to pay a local shop to redo the repair properly. And the Patagonia customer rep didn't seem to see the problem with the repair and offered… 15% off my next order.
I'm assuming that's a funny sarcastic take, given the sub we're on.
Suse is a lot smaller than Red Hat. Amazon with their Amazon Linux rebuild of RHEL (is that still the case?) are auch larger danger to Red Hat than Suse.
Oracle is a nasty piece of work of a company, and also just push a RHEL clone ("Unbreakable Linux", hence the Red Hat shirts "Unfakeable Linux").
Fuck if that will happen.
They can't even agree to limit coal, they can't care about rocks, so sentient beings?
Why? Refugees welcome.
That's the problem with this generation, no capacity to appreciate delayed dissatisfaction!
Le titre en question :
I have a feeling this is just looking for a clever way to say "but Linux isn't as secure as everyone thinks", which sure, yes. But also, not many people, especially knowledgeable people, are claiming that Linux is "secure".
And when it comes to "privacy friendly" that depends so much on what flavour of Linux you are using (Ubuntu? a minimal Arch? Tails?) that it's not really something you can make broad statements about.