avidamoeba

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That's @panda_abyss'es argument and it might work to add infrastructure where it doesn't exist but probably not to absolute zero cars. Which is fine. πŸ˜„

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you make the argument in a vacuum, without considering all other variables in play and the ones that would come in play at every next stage of it, then you might end up without car lanes. If you however consider thouse, then at every next step you'd have to prove to the judge that harm is done. Soon the other side would point out for example that people would die in ambulances stuck in traffic and they'll have the evidence to back it up. And that's where your car lane cutting crusade would end. You may succeed in getting rid of some more car lanes (good) but you won't get to clean them all up.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 33 points 3 days ago (6 children)

If you're onboard with this and can afford it, chip in to Cycle Toronto since this is probably not going to be the end of it and lawyers cost money.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Okay. Yeah that makes sense and in that case hosting on the Fediverse out of the UK would probably unblock it for a long time. If the blocking is not trivial - like one person adding a URL to a list - then they'd have to prioritize and they'd likely be going over bigger fish like international porn sites and such for a long time before they reach communities on the Fediverse that may or may not be self-designated NSFW. If they're on Reddit on the other hand, they get voluntarily blocked by the platform itself in the UK almost certainly without direction from Ofcom.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago

Wow this would have been nice in 1991. I guess the next best time is now. Would be nice if this starts a trend among central banks to exercise more fine grained control over banks other than purey monetary policy.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

In the very beginning and hard. Today I don't think it would do much other than strenghten cooperation within BRICS. They've shown they're resilient together and that China specificlly has enormous leverage over us being the manufacturer of vast number of inputs to our economies. Don't know whether India has enough of a leverage but I wouldn't be surprised if they increased reliance on BRICS instead of complying with sanctions. Especially given the nationalist line Modi is pushing domestically.

But again, the game was never really to stop the war. If it was, we could've not only applied stronger sanctions in the beginning but also sent all the weapons Ukraine needed in the beginning. Not waffle around about this or that weapon because of X or Y, meanwhile letting so many people die for lack of weapons. That produced an emigration wave which weakened Ukraine economically (and likely benefited ours). Putting all the damage together forced them to sell their resources to the US. And no, it's not just minerals. What's happened and what was sold to us are very different. So yeah, I don't buy for a second Trump's finger wagging about Ukraine as anything but US trade negotiation tactic.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yeah that part really is crazy. Obviously there's some mechanism but I don't know what. You've alreade checked change in torque and cadence as a cause. The only other thing that comes to mind is the force pointing backwards, experienced by the spindle from the chain pulling on it, which changes depending on which gear you're in and how tensioned the rear derailleur is. But I would think any such effect would be drowned by the forces of your legs on the cranks.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Without access to some debug interface that shows you what values come from the various components, you're stuck with hypothesizing and replacing parts, which is annoying and expensive. In that world, I'd also try replacing the torque sensor. I've seen it sold on Ali. I think they use a common part between multiple units but I'm not sure. I have their BB torque sensor and it seems it uses a spindle that looks like the ones used in their mid drives. They're not cheap though.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Sure but that means they have to have a mechanism, legal and material to execute this. There must be an gov't institution that looks for and designates sites to be blocked. Then they have to have legal power to compel UK ISPs to block those lists. Are these things part of this law? I haven't read enough.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

This isn't a currency issue. The processes driving this have been observed in 19-century Britain under a gold standard. For me it took looking into how firms decide what to produce, how to produce it and what to do with the profits in order to build a better picture on what's happening. This Talk at Google was a good starting point for me.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yes, got a Cyclami from Ali. It's very well made and I've been uaing it for inflation and topping up my tires for three months now.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago

Hey why do you have my pocket?

 

Bill 10, which holds landlords criminally liable for any drug activity on their properties, became law on June 4th.

Bill 10, put forward by Ontario Premier Doug Ford, passed into law on June 4th. Subtitled the Protect Ontario Through Safer Streets and Stronger Communities Act, it includes a clause that would hold landlords criminally liable for any illicit drug activity on their properties. The Schedule 8 clause targets drug trafficking, but also covers any possession that might indicate an intent to sell, even if it's just a few pills or a joint.

 

Democratic voters prefer a populist message over one that focuses on an "abundance agenda," according to a new poll by Demand Progress.

Poll: https://demandprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Poll-Results.pdf

 

I have a simple circuit where 5V signal is fed into a buffer (Nexperia 74LVC1G07), then from the buffer into another device. The buffer is fed 5V by a switching DC-DC (R-78HB5.0-0.5/W). After it's been off for a while, the buffer works, the signal is recognized by the receiver. This continues for some time, minutes, to tens of minutes. Then the buffer stops working. The DC-DC still works as well as the source. If I unplug it and let it sit for an hour, it resets back to working for a while until it stops.

Context:

The setup runs on an ebike 36V battery. Theres a hub motor connected to the same battery (via power controller). The signal source is a torque sensor. The destination is a bike computer.

Any idea what could be causing this? I don't know much about electronics. I learn specific bits to do something but I'm ignorant otherwise. E.g. I know what a buffer does, I understand how it works on high level but I have no clue for example how it could be affected by the rest of the system electrically through noise, EMI, etc. My physics intuition here makes me think there must be some charge buildup happening which dissipates with time when turned off. I've no idea if this is remotely valid, or if it is how to fix it. Any ideas are appreciated!

-20
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by avidamoeba@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
 

I did support Carney and I hope he does good things, and I don't think the following scenario would occur but I realize this belief is entirely based on my judgement of Carney's character which could be wrong.

I was thinking about the proposed gas pipeline to the east coast. If Carney hopes to be re-elected, he can't ram a pipeline through Quebec using emergency powers if such exist. Or he'd lose his seats in QC. Instead he's gotta give significant concessions to QC, like ownership, high royalties, etc. Stuff that he and Blanchet can sell to the Quebecers. I think this is certainly possible for a gas pipeline.

But then the following disaster scenario occurred to me. He likely has significant Brookfield investments in that blind trust. He likely has a seat open on that board whenever he quits public service. What if he uses emergency powers to ram a whole bunch of infrastructure, through P3s, where the private partner retains ownership, and the partner is Brookfield. Do as many of those as possible, get kicked out of office and sit on Brookfield's board, that much richer, while we get saddled with an even angrier and vindicated CPC fascism.

Thoughts?

Edit: Thanks for wading into my election PTSD nightmare!

 

I wanted to buy a pair of pants but I can't see Add to card anywhere. Am I blind?

view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί