atzanteol

Jujutsu does not use branches much because you are focused on the nodes in the commit graph. And instead of giving every of them manually a name, they are identified with change IDs.

This is... unforgivably obnoxious. What's the point of this? That's like saying "Instead of giving every directory a name manually you identify them by inode." The entire point of branches is to have a name that has meaning to me that I can use to refer to work I'm doing.

As soon as you edit a file, the changes will be included in whatever revision you're currently editing—there's no separate staging area in Jujutsu.

I create log files of runs, temporary helper scripts, build output, etc. in my working copy all the time. And this thing is going to "save me the burden" of having to add files manually by just adding... everything it sees.

You'll have noticed that at no point so far did we ever think about creating a branch. That's because Jujutsu's relationship to branches is a bit different to Git's—they're just pointers that you move around so they point to whichever revision you want them to at a given time.

"Simpler" apparently means I get to do a lot more book-keeping than when I use git.

Did you know sunlight causes cancer?

Initial reports are always crap. There's little point in even reporting them.

Congrats on the camera! It's a nice scene. Good "golden hour" colors.

As for critique: I agree with the other poster that some of the background (house, utility pole) detract a bit from the scene. Utility poles are my nemesis... They're always in the middle of a shot that I want putting a harsh line through the photo where I don't want it.

I would appreciate any tips on how to improve a picture like this in my editor.

Depends on what you mean by "improve". As the artist it's up to you how you want it to look. I'm personally not one to heavily stylize photos - usually just adjust blacks, highlights and contrast - maybe saturation and white balance as needed. You might want to start with those knobs doing some light editing to see what you like. Keep in mind a light-touch is often better than a heavy hand. This image feels a bit saturated - but then I like that - others may suggest toning it down a bit.

Are you shooting raw files (pef, dng, etc.)? If not then you might want to consider it. You have more flexibility with editing raw than you do jpg. But they do require you to process them which takes time.

Stack Overflow is becoming a resource for developers that need to solve AI-related issues

Stack overflow is becoming the fall back option if AI didn't help.

Well... No. You're reading the title. Read the document.

"We all know" is the gateway to ignorance. You need to test common knowledge to see if it's really true. Just assuming it is isn't knowledge, it's guessing.

Second - it's not always true:

for the fasta benchmark, Fortran is the second most energy efficient language, but falls off 6 positions down if ordered by execution time.

Thirdly - they also did testing of memory usage to see if it was involved in energy usage.

SCOTUS just needs to refuse to hear the case with "lgtm" and then they're free to give a lengthy rebuke of California if they try something similar.

They're not even pretending to be non biased anymore.

They provide the specific implementations used here: https://github.com/greensoftwarelab/Energy-Languages

I dislike the "I thought of something that may be an issue therefore just dismiss all of the work without thinking" approach.

Those types of things are completely fine. They are functionally inconsequential but show acknowledgement of a decision to serve that most Americans do not make and many would actively try to avoid if called to serve.

Eh. You've agreed to kill people for money. I don't see that as a virtue.

Why?

Many professionals are trying to do a job and don't much care about purity tests for being a "real developer".

If a tool works I use it.