Thanks for not linking to a single study like I asked.
Sorry, but I won't take you seriously until you do. You mentioned 'studies.' Show us them.
I've seen studies that disprove your studies.
Thanks for not linking to a single study like I asked.
Sorry, but I won't take you seriously until you do. You mentioned 'studies.' Show us them.
I've seen studies that disprove your studies.
Uhh, no. It was not her mistake that biased media outlets with an agenda say she said something while not actually reporting the exact thing she said.
It's bad journalism, but I don't think anyone expects reputable journalists to take this matter seriously.
Hmm. That's actually not that bad.
It's nice to see original sources for things. Everyone likes to twist and distort reality to support their agenda.
I think it's nice to have both, but I get your point.
I'm mostly still able to find text explanations for what I need.
Were they pro-Hamas or pro-Palestine?
It does, but I've noticed they've been slower to update in response to countermeasures like these.
What sucks about these measures (and others) is that they usually do a decent job of subverting the adblocker AdNauseam, which clicks on ads in addition to blocking them.
This forces me to us uBlock Origin, ironically causes the people who implement these countermeasures to make less money off of my visits.
To be fair, I don't think much has changed for small time twitter users.
All this facial recognition stuff is going to do is normalize wearing masks and other head-coverings in public.
I can just buy a world record for oldest skydiver even though I'm 18?