aspensmonster

joined 3 years ago
[–] aspensmonster@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 years ago

I'd say to make Value, Price, and Profit a requirement alongside Wage Labour and Capital; they're often published together too. But regardless, good list.

[–] aspensmonster@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

inb4 the whiny "bUt ThAT's aUtHOriTARiAniSm" chorus

[–] aspensmonster@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago

well that's a big gif-turned-webm -__-

[–] aspensmonster@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] aspensmonster@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Absolutely not, and this article goes into quite a few reasons why:

https://blog.brixit.nl/developers-are-lazy-thus-flatpak/

Sadly there's reality. The reality is to get away from the evil distributions the Flatpak creators have made... another distribution. It is not a particularly good distribution, it doesn't have a decent package manager. It doesn't have a system that makes it easy to do packaging. The developer interface is painfully shoehorned into Github workflows and it adds all the downsides of containerisation.

While the developers like to pretend real hard that Flatpak is not a distribution, it's still suspiciously close to one. It lacks a kernel and a few services and it lacks the standard Linux base directory specification but it's still a distribution you need to target. Instead of providing seperate packages with a package manager it provides a runtime that comes with a bunch of dependencies.

If you need a dependency that's not in the runtime there's no package manager to pull in that dependency. The solution is to also package the dependencies you need yourself and let the flatpak tooling build this into the flatpak of your application. So now instead of being the developer for your application you're also the maintainer of all the dependencies in this semi-distribution you're shipping under the disguise of an application. And one thing is for sure, I don't trust application developers to maintain dependencies.

Even if there weren't so many holes in the sandbox. This does not stop applications from doing more evil things that are not directly related to filesystem and daemon access. You want analytics on your users? Just requirest the internet permission and send off all the tracking data you want.

Developers are not supposed to be the ones packaging software so it's not hard at all. It's not your task to get your software in all the distributions, if your software is useful to people it tends to get pulled in.

Another issue is with end users of some of my Flatpaks. Flatpak does not deal well with software that communicates with actual hardware. A bunch of my software uses libusb to communicate with sepecific devices as a replacement for some Windows applications and Android apps I would otherwise need. The issue end users will run in to is that they first need to install the udev rules in their distribution to make sure Flatpak can access those USB devices. For the distribution packaged version of my software it Just Works(tm)

[–] aspensmonster@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 years ago

That, and the conversations move far faster there. Any remark about anything moves the subject further up, and you’re essentially subjected to reading the comments section of the entire sub all at once when you just came for the memes.

It's the difference between asynchronous and synchronous mediums of communication. Lemmy is much closer to async, and Discord much closer to sync. No medium is ever going to be able to square that circle. You can't have both.

[–] aspensmonster@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 years ago

The US has a massive racialized prison industrial complex. 25% of the world's prison population. It's The New Jim Crow. And that's all before Guantanamo.

[–] aspensmonster@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 2 years ago

Good luck. The USSR collapsed 30+ years ago and was in decline since 50+ years ago. The odds of that person having actually lived through anything other than shock therapy or revisionism are small.

[–] aspensmonster@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago

There’s a reason all irl votes are private.

That's odd. I can see my representatives' voting records plain as day.

[–] aspensmonster@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because in real life, it’s (relatively) easy to have both anonymity and trust.

It's cute that people still believe this.

view more: ‹ prev next ›