ashe

joined 2 years ago
[–] ashe@lemmy.starless.one 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I do, actually

[–] ashe@lemmy.starless.one 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

BG3 did everything well, no surprises there

[–] ashe@lemmy.starless.one 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

...for a few hours, until you need water. And food. And shelter.

Please don't tell me that you think people living in the woods by themselves because our extremely advanced modern society with practically limitless resources compared to nearly all of history can't provide basic needs like that for everyone participating in it is a-okay.

[–] ashe@lemmy.starless.one 2 points 2 years ago

Most modern international corps (can we just start calling them megacorps now?) would fit in there

[–] ashe@lemmy.starless.one 34 points 2 years ago (8 children)

I could be wrong but I don't think there even is a way to fully prevent adblocking without something like the proposed web integrity API, since it's all clientside and the browser can easily just choose not to render any ads.

Overall I do agree that less people using adblocks means less attention from corps and less adblock-blocks like youtube's, but I'm conflicted on whether that's a good enough reason to have most people suffer through so many ads.

[–] ashe@lemmy.starless.one 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Free to read? Where? Without links your arguments are just as good as a flat earther's "do your own research".

[–] ashe@lemmy.starless.one 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I would rather do that instead of indirectly killing a bunch of unwilling people, yeah.

[–] ashe@lemmy.starless.one 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I know right, like give me womanpages I'd read those

view more: ‹ prev next ›