arkcom

joined 2 years ago
[–] arkcom@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

it's a blurb in the linked announcement.

[–] arkcom@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago (7 children)

https://www.reddit.com/r/Socialism_101/comments/lua87n/why_does_china_have_so_many_cameras_on_the_streets/gp67qx9/

moderator of

r/ABoringDystopia
r/capitalism_in_decay
r/InformedTankie
r/JucheGang
r/fediverse
r/asktankies
r/GunZedong
r/CapitalismInAction
r/Communist_Gaming
r/Communism1O1

is parentis_shotgun dessalines

[–] arkcom@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

Since people keep downvoting me and arguing the existence of something easily verifiable here is a screenshot.
donate to lemmy devs

[–] arkcom@kbin.social -2 points 2 years ago

@73ms I don't see a problem with removing it from existing sites that can't reasonably change at this point - I actually convinced Beehaw to do so. However, if someone is looking to spin up an instance at this point, there are alternatives.

[–] arkcom@kbin.social -3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The problem is every lemmy instance features links to donate to devs by default. Removing it is kind of a moral dilemma of using someone's software without contributing, so it's better to just not use it all.

[–] arkcom@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

The problem is many Lemmy instances don't use downvotes (like beehaw), so posts and replies from those sites will unnaturally rise to the top and drown out other users.

[–] arkcom@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Under more -> activity

[–] arkcom@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

It's extra annoying, because lemmy people can downvote, but they can't (as far as I know) boost.

[–] arkcom@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (4 children)

If big instances like Beehaw go whitelist federation only, it will effectively make single user instances useless.

view more: ‹ prev next ›