antonim

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Ah, sorry for bothering then, I thougt it's only for users from other instances :/

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

This sort of meaningless "gotchas" aimed at the US govt is becoming insufferable. Trump cheats at golf, they paved over the grass before the White House, Vance fucks couches and listens to Queen... I'm sure they're trembling and praying we don't also find out Trump doesn't know how to use chopsticks and Vance got a speeding ticket in 2009. Their power would crumble immediately.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 23 hours ago

otherwise my instance might have gotten defederated

Umm, wait what?

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

See Lena (the dev)'s explanation. Option 2 also includes just using Kbin and Mbin.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago

in the name of surveillance

Who surveils who here, though? I can be surveiled but also surveil the surveiler myself, as long as the person is on an instance that hasn't opted out. And isn't viewing people's old comments a pretty similar sort of "surveillance"? The difference comes mainly from how we're used to the reddit model where comments are public and votes are private...

Lemvotes has been available for many months, yet there's been no "chilling effect" on anyone's behaviour, as far as I see.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

He operates /c/pixeldungeon@lemmy.world :D

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

For me, the frequency of which character I played is probably huntress>wizard=assassin>warrior. But I kind of fell out of the loop when evan (the dev) introduced a whole new class 😅

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago

Yes. Especially in this case where the distribution system is so unreliable. Your own list of "pro" easily beats the "cons".

If anyone has a guide on how to create a torrent, pls share

If you're on a private tracker, usually they should have a detailed guide. I would guess public ones have it too, idk for sure tho.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Shattered Pixel Dungeon. Spent years on that one.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Against. Occasionally I snoop through someone else's up/downvotes ("oh yeah, this guy is a cunt, just as I thought"). However, it seems unfair that I get to check the votes of people from servers that haven't opted out, while as a dbz0 user myself I'd be safe from such "inspection". (Have any other major servers opted out anyway?) It's a problem (if it is a problem) that should be resolved across the board, not just from individual instances.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I feel I cannot relax if I have to read.

That's horrifying, ngl

23
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/firefox@lemmy.world
 

I don't know how many times already I've had to remove this, and now nothing seems to work anymore. Setting browser.newtabpage.activity-stream.newtabLayouts.variant-b to false should work, I guess, but it doesn't.

Edit: shishka_b0b has posted a solution (as for enlarging the quick link icons, I forgot the simplest solution - zooming in the page)

634
conclusions rule (infosec.pub)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Forum#Update_on_the_UK_legal_challenge_to_Online_Safety_Act_categorisation_rules

Hello everyone,

My name is Phil - I work in the Wikimedia Foundation’s Legal department, and I’m here to provide two updates on our legal challenge to the UK Online Safety Act’s “categorisation rules”. Those rules are written so broadly that Wikipedia could be lumped in as a “Category 1 service”. This would subject it to extra duties under the Act that could seriously impact the privacy, safety and empowerment of the Wikipedia community, and our collective ability to sustain the Wikimedia projects. For background on the OSA and our legal challenge, see here (Diff), or a more detailed post here (Medium).

First, an administrative note: the High Court has agreed to expedite our case, and set a two-day trial next month: July 22-23. We expect the hearings to be public, and can be observed in person at the beautiful Royal Courts of Justice in London.

Second: the Foundation will be joined in this case by a Wikipedian, as joint claimant. User:Zzuuzz, a longterm UK-based user, will play a pivotal role in articulating the human rights implications of this case, including for your rights to privacy, safety, free speech, and association.

I hope you’ll join us in expressing deep appreciation to User:Zzuuzz for volunteering to take this extraordinary step, and standing up for the Wikimedia movement worldwide. This might be legal history in the making: our early searches haven’t turned up any legal precedent of a website’s host and its users proactively joining forces to bring a legal challenge.

We’ll aim to provide further updates on Meta, and we’ll watch discussions for a few days in case there are questions we can usefully answer. As this is a critical moment in active litigation, we apologise for not commenting as freely as we’d like. Best regards,

PBradley-WMF (talk) 08:10, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

 

Image A shows Bosnian Cyrillic as used in stone inscriptions.

The columns go: Latin (BCMS) alphabet - Greek - Cyrillic "church letters" - Cyrillic "civil letters" (Peter the Great's reform) - Bosnian letters: 14th, early 15th and late 15th century, typical forms

For context, the BCMS alphabet mostly corresponds to the same IPA symbol, with only these exceptions: Gj /d͡ʐ/, Ž /ʒ/, Lj /ʎ/, Nj /ɲ/, Ć /t͡ʂ/, Č /t͡ʃ/, Dž /d͡ʒ/, Š /ʃ/.

Image B shows various examples of handwritten cursive Bosnian Cyrillic.

This variant of Cyrillic was used in modern-day Bosnia and parts of Croatia (Dalmatia and Dubrovnik), mainly from 14th to 17th century. It used the letter "djerv" <Ꙉ> for /t͡ʂ/, which eventually became a part of the modern Serbian Cyrillic alphabet as <ћ>.

Images from Frane Vuletić's Gramatika bosanskoga jezika (1890).

view more: next ›