antonim

in the name of surveillance

Who surveils who here, though? I can be surveiled but also surveil the surveiler myself, as long as the person is on an instance that hasn't opted out. And isn't viewing people's old comments a pretty similar sort of "surveillance"? The difference comes mainly from how we're used to the reddit model where comments are public and votes are private...

Lemvotes has been available for many months, yet there's been no "chilling effect" on anyone's behaviour, as far as I see.

He operates /c/pixeldungeon@lemmy.world :D

For me, the frequency of which character I played is probably huntress>wizard=assassin>warrior. But I kind of fell out of the loop when evan (the dev) introduced a whole new class 😅

Yes. Especially in this case where the distribution system is so unreliable. Your own list of "pro" easily beats the "cons".

If anyone has a guide on how to create a torrent, pls share

If you're on a private tracker, usually they should have a detailed guide. I would guess public ones have it too, idk for sure tho.

Shattered Pixel Dungeon. Spent years on that one.

Against. Occasionally I snoop through someone else's up/downvotes ("oh yeah, this guy is a cunt, just as I thought"). However, it seems unfair that I get to check the votes of people from servers that haven't opted out, while as a dbz0 user myself I'd be safe from such "inspection". (Have any other major servers opted out anyway?) It's a problem (if it is a problem) that should be resolved across the board, not just from individual instances.

I feel I cannot relax if I have to read.

That's horrifying, ngl

Ancient Greek sure is a bitch to spell in English.

This is more likely to be consicous maliciousness, IMO. These programmers and lawmakers have immense resources and knowledge on their hands, I refuse to believe they were just dumb dumbs who failed to consider this problem arising.

You don’t have the power to decarbonize all electricity

From the article:

Location also affects how carbon emissions are managed. Germany has the largest carbon footprint for video streaming at 76g CO₂e per hour of streaming, reflecting its continued reliance on coal and fossil fuels. In the UK, this figure is 48g CO₂e per hour, because its energy mix includes renewables and natural gas, increasingly with nuclear as central to the UK’s low-carbon future. France, with a reliance on nuclear is the lowest, at 10g CO₂e per hour.

This is a massive difference, and clearly doable, nothing that would be limited to the distant future.

So I get this right? I'm naive for expecting govt regulations to put companies' behaviour under control, whereas you're realistic by expecting hundreds of millions of people deciding to systematically minimise their Youtube/Tiktok/Spotify/Netflix/Zoom usage? Hmm, alright.

And yet in an another comment you also expect that Spotify shouldn't introduce video streaming, without any external regulation but out of pure goodness of their hearts?

No, since the article doesn't mention anything of that sort. I really, really doubt that in the world of crypto mining and AI training the average people streaming some music and music videos will make a substantial difference. Your degrowth-oriented approach sounds like it would just solidify the already highly monopolised market, as any new players or innovation can be met with the "wastes too much bandwidth" hammer, as is this new service by Spotify right here.

I highly recommend reading research about the sustainability of the internet.

This is the first article that I get on Google. Now, as they say, "I ain't reading all that" (I probably wouldn't understand most of it), but I did take a look at the abstract:

Decarbonising electricity would substantially mitigate the climate impacts linked to Internet consumption, while the use of mineral and metal resources would remain of concern. A synergistic combination of rapid decarbonisation and additional measures aimed at reducing the use of fresh raw materials in electronic devices (e.g., lifetime extension) is paramount to prevent the growing Internet demand from exacerbating the pressure on the finite Earth’s carrying capacity.

Sounds good to me! With no mention of having to limit our internet usage.

And if reducing bandwidth waste really were that important, it would have go both ways anyway, with the providers optimising their content (probably forced to do so by regulations in some way).

To minimise the environmental footprint of your own music streaming, use Wi-Fi rather than 4G or 5G. If you listen to a song repeatedly, purchase a download to play. Use localised storage rather than cloud-based systems for all of your music and video files. Reduce auto-play, aimless background streaming or using streaming as a sleep aid by changing the default settings on your device including reducing streaming resolution. And turn your camera off for video calls, as carbon emissions are 25 times more than for audio only.

Lol no I won't.

What a stupid, bizarre and illogical article. It clearly shows that the key is in moving to renewables yet it still argues for the users also doing this sort of tiny useless gestures. I suspect it's AI-written at least in part.