anton

I have most clothes in a shelf but with one drawer for T-shirts and one for underwear and socks built in.
If the shirt stack gets to high there is a chance of falling over and socks obviously can't be stacked properly.

If a system was made to show blogs by the author and gets repurposed by a LLM to show untrusted user content the same code becomes unsafe.

As if a white space sensitive language protects from this fuckery.

• How many thin spaces are one level of indentation?
• Will anyone notice a hair space?
• Who can tell the difference between a space and a figure space? they are the same size in a mono spaced font

The comment in the first example is wrong, it should be no nontrivial divisors.
Quite ironic, that they can prove theorems about their code, but the comments can't be checkt by the compiler, resulting in their first math example being wrongly described.

!dull_mens_club@lemmy.world sometimes has NotInterestsing content, but mostly personal storys. example

Moral sollte sich nicht auf Religion begründen.

That cat overthrew democracies in South America.

I guess they vote blue no matter who.

Does it count if I have to google which key to hold down to enter the boot menu or bios every time? There are 12 function keys and esc.

How does one go about encrypting a message using a public key?

Find the place in your trusted email programms settings to add the recipients public key and select it when sending the mail.
If you want to be able to answer their questions you or identify yourself in follow up emails, you should also generate your own key.

Also should I use a burner email ID to send the encrypted message to guardian?

Anyone spying on you will only be able to see that you contacted the guardian but not what you told them. Having a burner would mean someone sees you contacting the burner service and than the newspaper. That said you should probably make a new email for it but I don't know what exactly you understand as a burner email.

Russell's paradox also contains arbitrary rules. It's just that the Axioms of ZF set theory are more commonly accepted than those of the fictional village.

What would limit a human in that way?

The rules of the "barber paradox".
This isn't about a real village of real people but a mathematical relation between objects that is given a more relatable name.

What would make him fundamentally incapable of shaving himself?

The fact that "[t]he barber only shaves men who don’t shave themselves"