This article was making some very good points. And then it started citing Peter Thiel, which is like, fine, I suppose, since he is relevant to the story of PayPal. And then it asserted that "the new progressive politics around race and gender" form an ideological pillar of the new totalitarian regime, and then I realized maybe I'm not a part of the "free people" this article was written for lol
anova
joined 2 years ago
I'm not a lawyer, but the argument I always hear is that the Creative Commons licenses don't directly say anything about software and don't cover any of the unique ways in which software can be used. If you were to use a creative commons license on your code, it'd be mostly up to interpretation how the more abstract language of "works" applies to it, which is something that hasn't (to my knowledge) been decided in a court
TikTok should have never been invented