Just so we are good, I was being rhetorical in my questions, not targeting them at you.
But also I think I am coming around to the GOP approach: who cares if it's perfectly true when it is essentially true?
Just so we are good, I was being rhetorical in my questions, not targeting them at you.
But also I think I am coming around to the GOP approach: who cares if it's perfectly true when it is essentially true?
Don't be that person, the one who oversimplifies an accident into a single issue instead of a chain of events - the circling maneuver, the NVG training, the other plane on approach further out, the discrepancy in altimeter readings between PiC/PM in the Blackhawk, stepped-on comms, the list of things that could easily contribute is already an arm's length long.
Edit: you know what would be great? If the FAA had the resources necessary to implement NTSB's recommendation backlog. Do you feel firing lots of FAA staff helps us or hurts us on that front?
lol, smurf tube, never heard that but know exactly what you're talking about.
All current popular AI is meant to run on GPU. Why are you going to spend more money to run it on hardware for which it isn't intended?
Never let a business person near a functioning business. Never, ever let a business person be in charge of government.
This is what happens when you put DUI hires at the top.
My question still remains: why would you trust this company that demonstrated their own ineptitude on stage?
Where the fuck have you been?
Didn't this guy break one of the "bulletproof" windows on a Cybertruck with a metal ball he threw at it?
Why would anyone serious trust this company to make a.legitimate military vehicle?
Personally think Nissan is better positioned for the EV future and Honda is likely to be the one that needed this more. 🤷♂️
Hit the red button. Let them know you didn't let it ring.
Tell your son there is nothing less manly than doing what someone else tells you is or isn't manly.
Get him a few Louis L'Amore books.