I agree with being pragmatic, but the opinion of hating Microsoft isn't unfounded. There are pragmatic reasons to avoid building up and entrenching yourself in tooling that doesn't respect you as a user or is controlled by companies that has interests that don't align with yours.
andruid
joined 3 years ago
AppArmor is less complicated. That's the main reason
We need more need to normalize companies stepping up to pay for security development for opensource products they utilize. If companies aren't putting FTEs to cover their risk of using a product or service then they should be held liable for any damages that causes them or their customers. This is for more than FOSS and for more than CVEs but also critical errors that cause delays in business continuity.
The issue is many c suite are just now under standing this and many justice systems seem behind on this.
I mean people have doing new works in the style of other artists for a while as well.
The fighting stance is how I treat all illnesses, it suggests both a need for support and, through discipline and great effort, a path to recovery assisted by our actions.
Semi independent thoughts now available for the discount price of $999 a month!*
*Terms and conditions may apply
Still very annoying if it's something you installed or got installed, even if fully refunded.
I've described it as cost flexible, because you should be funding or ensure developers are funded to a level appropriate level of risk to operations if a vulnerability is discovered or a critical failure prevents a correct operation.
That's for big business and governments at least. Small businesses also has the same concerns but the risk matrix for them is just different.
It'll be interesting to see if this gets used in places where the cost of dedicated hardware out ways the bandwidth available. Video calls to Antarctica, shipping vessels, airplanes, space, etc. At least that's something that comes to mind. Could also see a next interation of CDNs using it, if the numbers check out.
Training tends to be more compute intensive while inference is more likely to be able to be ran on a smaller hardware foot print.
The neater idea would be a standard model or set of models, so that a 30G program can be used on ~80% of target case, games and video seem good canidates for this.
I like Linux for a lot of reasons, but the reason I was dualbooting the most was more packages for AI and the like just worked on it and I was programming.
The reason I deleted my windows partition though was I had a faulty drive that on windows ment I would crash all the time, but my Linux boot just worked for like another year on the failing disk with no issue. When I got a new drive I just installed Linux and didn't bother getting Windows again.
I have to Linux for work sometimes and the biggest pet peeve for me is that the app search bar is always slow or broken. Like it is so good on KDE, I default to superkey, search app, enter compared to opening any lists of menus.
I do remember reading India declaring a switch for government computers a while back. So maybe that?