I'm seeing a lot of uncited claims. If these are just conjecture or opinion you could be clearer on it. If they're not, citing sources is probably a good idea.
amio
joined 2 years ago
If the word triggers some symptom, then why would that same word, "hidden" by a trick that wouldn't faze a six-year-old, be any less harmful?
This is an outrage.
I have absolutely no idea. "So how have you been doing since ruining my life? IV drug abuse? That's awesome, man, heard about that one through the grapevine and it gave me some... well, not joy, of course, but definitely a bit of grim satisfaction. Maybe there's something to this karma thing after all, eh?"
Which inaccurate doomer myths? Because every time I hear this, it's "well, I'm sure that'll be ni-aaaaaaand it's climate denialism"
Well, at least people were saved from terrible tra*ma by cl*verly h*ding the "u" in "ab*sive". Can't tell that's what it says at all...
... well that's just stupid. Have these people ever played a game?
It ain't easy being beans.
Sure. They're so "far left" (Marxist-Leninist, allegedly) they're all the way up an unrepentant, fascistic, oligarchic, autocratic, right wing dictator's asshole. Presumably the "logic" is that at least Russia used to be communist, and isn't "amerikkka" (staggeringly witty stuff, huh?), but it's pretty clear they're just trolls - or nearly undistinguishable from trolls. That is not effort I'd recommend wasting on their dumb asses.
Speaking as a mildly militant atheist, this is some of the smartest shit I've ever seen a religious adherent say.
Saves, especially save states/quicksave. Some kind of way to tell you what is actually the correct answer, not just what someone thinks is, or wants to be, the correct answer. Enough predictability to give you a reasonable shot at things.