Es ist eben die Grundlage ihres Geschäftsmodells möglichst alle deine Daten zu benutzen um dir Werbung anzuzeigen. Das werden die nicht einfach freiwillig abschalten, auch wenn es sie ein klein wenig kostet.
akulium
joined 2 years ago
Based on the Americans I met, I don't believe that is generally true. It varies a lot by region and social environment.
I mentioned it because it was an annoying limitation for me. 100mb is not a lot for media and zip files nowadays. And I don't know any good free services that will work more conveniently than simply sending with Telegram, suggestions welcome.
Telegram let's you send 2gb files, and stores them forever. Signal has a 100mb limit.
It also used to be easier to set up on multiple devices at the same time, but I believe that Whatsapp and Signal have improved that by now too.
Telegram has no end-to-end encryption for normal messages
Try search.brave.com, it can do that.
They have their own index unlike ddg which is just a proxy for bing. Bing removed the minus feature at some point.
Maybe the graph was created by an economist
If there is any company that can do personalized ads for music then it is Spotify. It's what they are best at, why would they skip that opportunity?
Most ads are terrible because they are annoying and advertise bad products. I think that's less likely to be a problem here because your music is the ad, if it is annoying and bad you will simply stop listening and they lose money on the ad.
If it would be ads for podcasts for example, it would be much much worse for me.
Now is that good or bad?
The setting sounds a bit like how someone in the 1960s might have imagined the future