No? You can't just call for people's death and leak their info. It's actually illegal, that's why they got temp banned.
Gets me excited for light no fire.
This thing is DOA, Samsung doesn't have the same rabid fan base as Apple. Headsets just don't work for productivity, they're still too bulky. You can ignore it while you're swinging your arms playing pistol whip, but not when you're looking at a spreadsheet.
All I take from this is that you're distraught I don't agree with you.
How does pointing that out make me a fanboy? Interesting you chose to call names and denounce instead of being civil like @viking@infosec.pub. Why is that?
Yes. 25% of U.S. citizens linguistically means 25% of all U.S. citizens. They don't need to specify alive, because they had to be alive inorder to participate. It is not dishonest in this case because they (the original study) listed the date the survey was conducted and didn't not try to portray an old study as modern.
The only thing needed is to add 'surveyed' after the descriptor. Anything else is dishonest.
25% of 800 U.S. citizens surveyed is not indicative of the entire country. Not only that, the original study release here (as far as I could find) doesn't state how or where the survey was conducted.
A survey done in California would be wildly different than one done in Mississippi. That article and this post are ethically dishonest, and the study proves absolutely nothing.
Good work! Thank you for providing comprehensive installation instructions as well.
Late and small, but on the drop downs for things like subscriptions, about pages, moderators, and things like that. The arrow shouldn't switch sides when selecting it. Thanks for all you do!
Okay so jaywalking doesn't warrant death. Where do you draw the line?
It's not when they were calling for interns of government agencies death. What's scary is no one here is looking for context.