admin

joined 2 years ago
[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They already are. They put all nsfw content behind a privacy paywall (pay with email and browsing habits). Luckily it can still be subverted through old.reddit.com - but the question is for how long.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 7 points 1 year ago

Report these articles with "Business news, not tech news", and there's a high chance it'll be removed.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm probably a minority in this (although probably not so much here on Lemmy), but if anything, I'd want my TV to be less smart, and less personalised. I don't want Google to know what my favourite TV shows and movies are. I don't want "suggestions" on which streaming platforms I could also install (often before the content I would actually want to see). And I most definitely don't want my TV to be monitoring the rest of my "smart" home.

For the people who are part of this articles titular "we", I seriously wonder: why would you have been waiting for this?

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not a competition :(

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One could also say that building a camera from first principles is a lot more work than entering a prompt in DALL-E, but using false equivalents isn't going up get us very far.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Also policing training would be completely unenforcable

That's where laws would come in. Obviously it would have civil law, not criminal law, but making sure it would be enforceable would have to be part of such laws. For example, forcing model makers to disclose their training dataset in one way or another.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 1 points 1 year ago

And yet, he's the one that's squinting.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you elaborate on that claim? I couldn't find anything substantial in the article.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not being facetious though. Off-site backups of a digital password collection are easy to setup and maintain. But when you change your password or add a new entry, it's going to be a pain in the ass to have to drive over and update a physical copy.

If you can live with those downsides, that's fine. But in my opinion it would be facetious to pretend a physical backup is "just as good/usable" as a digital one.

-edit: whoops, misread that as implying that I was being facetious. As you were sir -

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If getting a Dropbox account is too difficult for them, I seriously wonder why they'd be subscribed here, or reading articles about password management in browsers.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 21 points 1 year ago (6 children)

If you never, ever need your passwords outside of your home, that's great advice - it's as secure as can be against digital theft. Less so against fire though, and backups are out of the question.

view more: ‹ prev next ›