ChatGPT is not good enough to use as a substitute for (whatever), but can be a useful tool for someone who can quantify its output.
admin
Thanks, that's a relief!
I think they provide a very reasonable reality check / a bit of reflection. And it sounds like you could use one, if you're surprised that Facebook still exists.
Same. While Linus is part of the problem for using practices he claims to disagree with, I'd rather be part of the solution by not rewarding it with attention.
That's a use. But not their only use.
Counter point: Poe's law.
Don't worry, they'll just delete the lemmy post after they got their share of clickbait clocks, and then repost it later with a slightly less inflammatory title.
Yeah, nor does the country crowd source the money for the investigation, so I'm starting to see a pattern in your answers.
Have a good weekend.
You keep trying to move the conversation to different subjects, but I want to address your initial claim - inviting a third party to do an independent investigation of a company's alleged wrongdoings. I never heard of such a thing occurring.
But fine, let's go with your example.
If there was a scandal at GN, and they'd use that crowd source money to pay for a third party investigation, it would somehow be better than what LMG did now?
That's not what I was referring to. I meant using a commercial third party investigation for the alleged wrongdoings of a company (just like what happened here), except it's funded through crowd sourcing. When has that ever happened?
Like, who is the demographic that would pay for that? In the end, I figure it would still most likely be an invested party coughing up a substantial part of the money.
What.
In what world does this happen?
This guy gets it.