admin

joined 2 years ago
[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Who knows, maybe it'll teach people to be more skeptical of the things they read online, and actually look for the underlying sources.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 1 points 1 year ago

But why wouldn't those same limits not apply to biological controllers? A neuron is basically a transistor.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Because people don't read articles, and this way OP can still get the rage-engagement

In a way, that's what I'm contributing to now as well. So that's why I'm not even going to

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I'd wager the main reason we can't prove or disprove that, is because we have no strict definition of intelligence or sentience to begin with.

For that matter, computers have many more transistors and are already capable of mimicking human emotions - how ethical is that, and why does it differ from bio-based controllers?

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 5 points 1 year ago

The line has been changed to be gender neutral 9 hours ago. Victory!

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 67 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh my. Sometimes Betteridge's law of headlines is wrong.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 4 points 1 year ago

I was about to mention this example. It's everything you love about mythbusters (doing crazy science experiments), without everything you hate about mythbusters and what made me stop watching. No more constant hopping over between the different myths per episode, or tons of recaps.

Just myths, one at a time, no bullshit.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 6 points 1 year ago

You, me, a few other people.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Ah, yes, I do.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So... What link did you send?

view more: ‹ prev next ›