If buying isn't owning then piracy isn't stealing.
adam
I mean, the linked article does a pretty good explanation?
Didn't even think 4k80 was generally available yet?
You've not factored in egress costs. Which on Amazon can add up quite quickly.
There's a couple of caveats with it, but I think neither are worse than your proposed flow.
- After putting things in an album you'll need to manually run the migration job to have immich reorganise into album folders.
- Images in multiple albums will only be migrated to the path of the newest album.
Immich does support folders?
https://immich.app/docs/administration/storage-template/
With this you can store your photos in whatever structure you want.
I watched something very similar to this hit at least 40mph (~65kph) down my 30mph (~50kph) limit road the other day. The guy did not have a helmet on and was in a light jacket and jeans with trainers.
It was as you said, a motorcycle with pedals - only ridden by more of an idiot than the people who ride around during summer on 600cc bikes wearing shorts and t-shirts (cause at least they have a crash helmet on)
There are some justifyable reasons for kicking though. It's abuse of that process that is causing issues.
I do like the idea of grouping people with high incidents of kick actions though. It wouldn't be an instant fix but over time the two camps should separate out fairly nicely.
This was a fantastic Matrix OST song.
Gonna go add that to my film queue now.
Docker will have only exposed container ports if you told it to.
If you used -p 8080:80
(cli) or - 8080:80
(docker-compose) then docker will have dutifully NAT'd those ports through your firewall. You can either not do either of those if it's a port you don't want exposed or as @moonpiedumplings@programming.dev says below you can ensure it's only mapped to localhost (or an otherwise non-public) IP.
ActivityPub implementations generally don't allow this.
This comment will, when I click 'Reply', be sent to your instance (dormi.zone), that instance should then run it's filter/block checks on it and if it's happy it will forward it onto the lemmy.ml instance for further disemination amongst the subscribers of the group.
If you were to have blocked me then my reply will appear on my instance only (which is admitedly tiny - at 1 user) and go no further. This kind of falls apart if I were to be on a bigger instance as more people would see the reply.
That said, Lemmy may not be doing that quite right as the whole Groups/Communities thing is sort of an extension of the main protocol. I hope it's doing it the right way.