"Antisemitic song" is rather understating things...
Gender: People took the dimorphism found in the very good sex God created, and iterated upon it for thousands of years, and now guys are allowed to wear polo shirts and girls are allowed to wear eyeliner. Gender is made up, and changes from place to place and time to time. Our gender is the first impression we give of ourselves, and it's extremely malleable, we can do with it as we will.
I don't think this truly gets at the essence of what gender is, at least in my own experience of it. What you're describing here feels like a combination of gender expression, and also the societal expectations built around gender. For me at least, my experience of gender lies somewhere below those things. It interacts with both of them, but it isn't either of them.
The way I put it is like this. If I was raised on an island of men, and had never met a woman, nor even had the concept of gender expression, I'd still feel something. A sense of not being the same as the people around me. It wouldn't manifest through expression, and it wouldn't manifest through cultural definitions of gender, because I wouldn't have those concepts. There would be a nameless something though, that I lacked the words to describe, that would exist even in that scenario, and that is where my own experience of gender lies.
Strange, she can't fall from a branch either. Whenever she does, she always seems to catch herself with spider web...
I have zero interest in going to a place where people who want to take away other peoples rights are given a welcome mat.
The people that will go there are people who want to (civilly) hate on other folk, and free speech absolutists.
What you won't get, is a genuine cross sampling of perspectives and viewpoints, because it will end up being dominated by hateful voices (civil voices, but hateful). And that's what the other person meant when they said that no moderation is a form of censorship/bias in and of itself. Which is to say, you won't saving anyone any time soon, because the people who do want to save folks will be the least likely to use the spaces
Love digiKam! It and darktable make up my daily drivers for my photography!
The first time I tried to use the scan and go system, I got pulled up at the exit point and had to prove that I'd purchased the stuff. Wasn't keen on being made to feel like they thought I'd robbed the place, so I never went back to it
That is a lot of bathrooms, and all of them require going in to someones bedroom for access!
Thanks for the heads up. Restarted the UI and it's working again now!
No, but if you think seeing one will make your eyes bleed and give you trauma, then it's a bit more than not wanting to see someones dick...
They are probably living in someones pot plants, or in some wood, or in a wall...
The future queens and the drones fly at breeding time, and the new queens then land and start a nest, so that can be anywhere an ant can fly or be blown to
You should give it a try and report back!
The way he tested in the video was to start recording a high DR scene (like a sunset) in D-Log M and then switch to auto ISO in the middle of the recording. It gave a direct comparison because you could see the range increase immediately in a single shoot
A passport in the way described here doesn't need to be centralised. Your profile could link to your other profiles through metadata, rather than a centralised system.