All fixed now!
Hrrmm, yep, I've replicated that. Will look in to it!
I mean the cameras will be like on the portable insta 360 camera. Two 180 lenses on opposite sides, with software stitching of the two to make them appear as a single 360 view. However, when you hold the camera in your hand, on the preview screen on the device itself, you have a more natural field of view that looks like a more traditional camera view. But all that is is a real time view of a small portion of the 360 sphere, it's not a dedicated lens.
And I imagine the drone will be the same, but the two lenses will look up and down rather than front and back. And the field of view you use to fly the drone, will just be a real time portion of that that imitates a traditional drone piloting camera perspective.
Though I just realised you might have meant something else by FPV. At the moment, FPV view for drones is basically just a large front facing camera, projected in to your face like a large virtual screen. It's not like VR, because there is no peripheral vision or the like. It's just a large virtual screen in front of your face.
But with a 360 view, the FPV experience would change significantly!
If I had to guess, it will have two cameras, one top, one bottom, and it will just dynamically give you a FPV you perspective to fly the drone with. But that's a guess!
Don't talk about whales
Someone spilt the tea...
The sad reality is, that's just what it's like dating cis men as a trans woman, at least when you're meeting them through apps or the like. The guys who hook up with trans women in those contexts are either chasers, or guys that are just curious. Neither of them is interested in anything long term though.
The guys who don't care whether you're trans or cis, who don't make it at the core of why they are interested in dating you, won't find you on dating apps.
Dating apps are awful for everyone, but as bad as they are, they are far far worse for trans folk.
I haven't banned you from any communities. I instance banned you. Which I did, because you implied that Arab folk are all sexist.
Which comes on the back of previous comments removed for transphobia, insults and posting swastikas.
I'll be instance banning you again now.
You really need to listen to what you're saying.
You're arguing for the right to deny people their own identities in their own safe spaces whilst claiming that somehow, the real issue is letting queer folk choose the language that works best for them.
t would be fine if you said "He was kind of pushy about trying to make his point and although he clearly wasn't coming from any hostile place,
He was repeatedly and deliberately gatekeeping people's identities. I don't know how to make that any clearer to you.
Whether or not any given person is a troll, it's not an excuse to make people's identities a reward for good behaviour.
If you decide that taking away peoples identities "because they're a troll" is ok, then you're telling the gender diverse people around you that you don't see them for who they are, and that you're just pretending to accept them as long as they behave in ways you find appropriate. Normalising the idea that we can decide other peoples identities is literally the goal of trolls, and so when you see a troll and decide that's a good reason to invalidate people, you're feeding the troll, and hurting the gender diverse folk around you.
I will respect a trolls identity, even as I ban them, because opening the door to deciding which identities are valid does nothing but hurt vulnerable people.
This was all explained to PJ, several times, and he doubled down. And tripled down. Whilst explicitly denying people's identities.
He was coming from a hostile place, and refused to leave it, even when it was explained to him.
I mean... aren't you positioning yourself as the arbiter of other folks' validity and identity?
The fact that you're equating the creation of protective rules in explicitly safe spaces as being morally identical to gatekeeping other folks identities makes me doubt your intentions. If you genuinely believe they're the same thing, you've got a lot of work to do. And if you don't believe they're the same thing, but are comparing them to win an internet discussion, then you're the one stirring up drama...
Is blahaj drama free?
I hope not.
We're an explicitly protective, safe space for a minority group that is actively targeted by governments, political institutions, churches, and bigots in general
So of course we create drama. Bigots will make sure of it.
He was banned from blahaj for literally just showing up and saying reasonable things. If that's against the rules of your instance
Nah. He was banned for repeatedly, deliberately, and knowingly breaking the rules. Whether or not you think gatekeeping someones identity is acceptable, blahaj.zone has rules against it, and his response to it was to deliberately break the rules and stir up shit.
A lot of people feel like, if they think something reasonable, they're allowed to say it, and it's weird and controlling for some other person to say that opinion is the incorrect opinion and demand that they not say it within certain spaces.
Tough shit. When someones "reasonable" opinion involves positioning themselves as the arbiter of other folks validity and identity, they're doing harm. When they choose to repeatedly and deliberately do that in a safe space for those folk, they're repeatedly and deliberately doing harm and breaking the rules.
All of which to say, even if you're a gatekeeper like him, who thinks that you have the right to tell other people their own identities, if you come in to a blahaj community and do it, you're breaking blahaj rules. If you choose to knowingly and repeatedly do it, whilst then complaining about it in various meta spaces, then you're breaking rules and stirring up drama.
It takes me somewhere between a week and two weeks to get through a bottle of wine...