ablackcatstail

joined 2 years ago
[–] ablackcatstail@lemmy.goblackcat.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Cats are gonna cat!

[–] ablackcatstail@lemmy.goblackcat.com 316 points 2 years ago (15 children)

Typical fear of missing out behavior. Folks flock to Threads to see what it's all about, see that it actually sucks, and bail.

They say the fish stinks from the head. Jamie Dimon is your typical corporate CEO asshole. I wouldn't expect any different.

Virtual Desktops haven't really been a thing that I've really needed in my work flow. Maybe one day I will give using one a shot. I actually prefer my current setup with dual 27" monitors.

[–] ablackcatstail@lemmy.goblackcat.com 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Here is a sample configuration that should work for you:

server:
        interface: 127.0.0.1
        interface: 192.168.1.1
        do-udp: yes
        do-tcp: yes
        do-not-query-localhost: no
        verbosity: 1
        log-queries: yes

        access-control: 0.0.0.0/0 refuse
        access-control-view: 127.0.0.0/8 example
        access-control-view: 192.168.1.0/24 example

        hide-identity: yes
        hide-version: yes
        tcp-upstream: yes

remote-control:
        control-enable: yes
        control-interface: /var/run/unbound.sock

view:
        name: "example"
        local-zone: "example.com." inform
        local-data: "example.com. IN A 192.168.1.2"
        local-data: "www IN CNAME example.com."
        local-data: "another.example.com. IN A 192.168.1.3"

forward-zone:
        name: "."
        forward-addr: 8.8.8.8
        forward-addr: 8.8.4.4

What makes the split-brain DNS work is if the request for resolution comes from the localhost or from inside your network, it will first go to the view section to see if there is any pertinent local data. So if you do a query from your home network, on say, example.com, it will return your internal IP address which in this case is 192.168.1.2

[–] ablackcatstail@lemmy.goblackcat.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well point of fact, yes, look at Chinese history. Chinese history is often summed up as being the "Dynastic Cycle." A dynasty would be generations of a single family ruling over a population.

I think people are generally missing the point that this was intended to be humorous. I know I got a chuckle out of it.

[–] ablackcatstail@lemmy.goblackcat.com 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Please forgive me for being the naysayer, but I won't support NVIDIA in any way until they open source their drivers and play nicely with the Linux and BSD communities.

[–] ablackcatstail@lemmy.goblackcat.com 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I would call it a Dynasty.

I think some of it was just fear of missing out.

This seems like a wise move for the time being. I am an Alma fan and supporter so I get that the foundation is trying to do everything it can to stay relevant.

Arch Linux is my go-to distro because I can literally install it in half the time that it takes a lot of others. I also like that it is very lightweight.

view more: ‹ prev next ›