Yeah, especially that they just announced it with both immediate and retroactive effect, so no warning to those who were almost finished with the documents and ready to apply. I feel really bad for those who were just ready to apply on March 31st...
Good luck!
From reading other news reports it seems like this was pushed through because not enough folks were actually establishing a connection to Italy and just trying to get into the EU. Remember that one of the changes is that if you have the Italian passport today, but you were not born in Italy, you can still pass it on to your children - you just have to live in Italy for two years first.
According to https://www.studiolegalemetta.com/press/italian-citizenship-jure-sanguinis-restrictions/ they're also planning to require spouses to live in Italy for two years before allowing them to naturalize (currently a spouse who lives abroad can naturalize regardless of where the couple lives).
And another planned change is to allow minor children of Italian citizens to naturalize after living in Italy for two years.
Rightly or wrongly, the basic theme seems to be that they're trying to push more folks who want the Italian passport to actually move to Italy.
Even if upheld by the constitutional court, there's still a use for the research and docs search.
From https://www.mazzeschi.it/italian-citizenship/italian-citizenship-by-naturalization/
Applications for naturalization can be filed after ten years of legal residence in Italy, which can be reduced to:
- 3 years of legal residence, for those who were born in Italy or who have parents or grandparents that were Italian citizens
Example: Ettore’s grandfather was an Italian citizen. Ettore has now been living in Pisa, Italy for 3 years. Ettore can apply for Italian citizenship at the relevant Town Hall where he has established his residency.
And if your great-great-grandparent was born in Italy, then there's a good chance that your grandparent born abroad was Italian (even if never registered as such). So not as easy as before but having an Italian ancestor is still helpful in regaining ties with the country...
Don't lose hope yet. See https://www.boccadutri.com/italian-citizenship-by-descent-decree-law-36-2025/ for a rundown on the timeline for the expected court challenges to this (along with the legal justifications to challenge this).
I think she's confused the poll with her reflection in the mirror...
Yeah, it seems the best I can hope for was that Carney agreed to show support outside while pressuring to drop from within.
Seems like the NAFTA option is still open to you if you're a US citizen, or maybe you can get your masters in Canada if you can scrounge up the funds?
I have a little bit of good news for you, and lots of bad. The good news is that as soon as someone becomes an asylum or refugee claimant in Canada, they can become eligible for IFHP which covers prescription drugs, see https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/help-within-canada/health-care/interim-federal-health-program/coverage-summary.html
(See also a recent example of an American citizen who got IFHP after applying for aslyum at the Candian-US border, https://www.tiktok.com/@katie/_katie2113/photo/7478861387322625322 )
And now the bad:
If the refugee claim fails, it's very tough to get into Canada afterwards. See https://vancouverimmigrationblog.com/is-it-possible-to-go-from-a-failed-refugee-claimant-to-an-economic-immigrant/ and https://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/threads/trv-for-previously-refused-refugee-claimant.123089/#post-2004890
If you did get approved for asylum or as a refugee, then you need to be careful never to return to the US or use or renew your US passport (or similar like passport card I guess), at least not until you've taken the oath and become a Canadian citizen.
If you do either, you risk losing it all and getting deported back to the US: https://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/threads/refugee-status-cessation-and-prs-applying-for-citizenship.333455/
Finally, I've been assuming that you're a US citizen. If you are not - most folks who make a refugee or asylum claim at the US-Canada border are denied because of the Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA) between Canada and the US, and so will usually be summarily returned to the US. (Somehow US citizens don't fall under this agreement.) So don't try this if you're not a US citizen, unless you're able to consult with a lawyer first.
So if you have any other way to get to Canada (you qualify for PR / Express Entry directly somehow and have enough points to get in - possibly because you are fluent in both French & English and have a masters; or you know someone who can get you a job offer that qualifies for a work permit under NAFTA; or you have enough funds to apply as an international student; or you are under 35 years and can qualify for a working holiday visa) - try that first. The consequences of failure there are less severe.
We're thinking the same thing.
Name is actually a hash of some of my former posts from spez's site, before I overwrote and deleted them (and reposted on kbin.social) and left for good.
Same here. (Granted, doxxing and violence are not cool, but from the article's reporting it's not clear if this actually occurred or was just alleged. I'm leaning more towards the latter - at least "standards" were probably applied more strictly and harshly. Musk wouldn't have had to personally ask for an intervention if these rules were generally and clearly getting broken....)
Well, I guess, how would you actually do that? Like, how do you convince the owner of Toptal to fold shop so your replacement can take shape?
It links to a map, https://www.newsweek.com/map-shows-states-most-likely-secede-1870679 (archive: https://archive.ph/oGlKO )
Surprising that support in Alaska (36%) and Texas (31%) is so much higher than the national average, I'd have thought it'd be blue states leading, shows what I know...