aasatru

Well, sure, it's if they are in the same room or they can hear through the walls or whatever. An actual flow of information, not just them lying to each other. I assumed that was obvious.

Two prisoners are arrested.

Both are given a choice: Rat out your buddy, and we'll let you go with one year in prison. Keep your moth shut and we'll give you four years. If you keep your moth shut and your buddy rats you out, you'll get ten. If you both rat, you both get eight years.

The dominant strategy of both prisoners is to speak: In either case, ratting on their buddy will lower their punishment. However, if both prisoners choose this strategy, they end up losing collectively: Rather than both receiving four years as they would if they both kept their moth shut, they both yet eight years because they both talk.

That's the basics of the dilemma. The years don't matter, just the ranking of preferences.

If the prisoners can communicate, they will know that the other prisoner didn't talk, and if one prisoner opens his mouth, he will know that the other prisoner will immediately do the same.

I learned the prisoner's dilemma when I studied game theory. The fact that it depends on a lack of information flowing between the prisoners and that snitching is only the dominant strategy when it's a single-round game is just parts of the assumptions of the dilemma.

I should also add that the prisoner's dilemma is only a dilemma when it is played in only one round. Once it becomes a game of several rounds cooperation arises as the dominant strategy.

Then again, I'm not sure how the prisoner's dilemma is relevant here in the first place, I just thought it was a funny point to make.

The prisoner's dilemma depends on the fact that the two prisoners cannot cooperate. If you allow information to flow between them it's literally not a dilemma any more.

So yes.

If you mean cooperation with the police, how the hell did you derive that from my text?

I currently live in Denmark. I have to admit I'm not following the public debate here very carefully, and there are plenty of backwards people around who will shout loudly about just about anything, but any reversal (or anything else than gradual strengthening) of trans rights would come as a huge surprise to me.

I am open for the possibility that I'm simply not following close enough. But I think the problem with trans rights is that it has become politicized, when it is really not a political issue. The fact that I have not heard about it at all in the public debate here is therefore, in my opinion, a good sign. For sure one can dig up shitty opinions if one starts looking for it, but they have not been given a defining role in the public debate as is the case in many countries.

Yeah, I'm not going to make the argument that people are fundamentally good either, and they are shaped by the media landscape they consume.

I live in a country where trans rights are not really questioned, and where I am feeling confident that they won't be. Of course it still has ways to go and there are bad people, but trans rights have not become effectively politicized and it's just not a point of contention.

It's no fundamental rule of society that we have to go around hating each other. It's a construct. That doesn't mean it's not the case where you live, but it's something that can be changed.

Leftists and other assorted humanists and progressives are wildly unpopular because most of the public simply can't imagine not having the sheer bloodlust they have for thy neighbor.

Believe it or not, this is not a necessity of human nature. It's just your society that's fucked up. And it's probably not even that bad if you go out and talk to people rather than judge society by the distorted reflection given on social media.

Social media is probably the most powerful propaganda tool of all times.

In the 1960s you would say the same thing about TV, and you'd be right. Before that it was the cinema. It's not because the mediums as such are inherently evil, but they carry an inherent power that can be used for evil.

Currently, social media is very much being used for evil.

There is, however, another element to it, and one that is completely new for social media. That's the illusion that we can actually contribute in a meaningful way by participating.

Nobody believes they are actively fighting fascism by watching TV all day. Yet, on social media, well-meaning people are wasting their time shouting at clouds rather than going out in the real world and and actually achieve anything. They collectively tread in water as democracy dies, all the while they feel like they are "doing their part". In other words, social media is pacifying as fuck.

I participate in the Fediverse because I have hope that we are building something different here; something that can derail the platforms that are currently used for evil, and something where the organization of actual opposition can be possible. I think it might be. But I am also afraid I am just wasting my time.

Social media is literally just a fairly accurate reflection of us as a species and our civilization.

Strong disagree. Capitalists sell it to us as a mirror, but it's a distorted mirror that shows us exactly what they want us to see for whatever reason.

If they want to sell us diet pills, they will turn it into one of those amusement park mirrors that makes you look fat. If they want to overthrow democracy, they'll turn it into a mirror where everyone standing around you suddenly look suspicious and cruel. And if the Russians want to pay them to get control of what people will see in the mirror, hell - that's just freedom of expression.

Add on top that pretty much everyone on earth is staring mindlessly into the mirror for hours every day, and you got yourself what I would consider to be a problem.

Here's the painting, to save everyone from clicking their way to Reddit.

It's a completely unremarkable painting of Trump. The artist took some creative liberties giving him skin colour.

I think the president would be more unhappy if we focused on his actions.

I'm not active on Reddit. Super happy to help people out if they make their way over here, though!

It seems some users have some sort of group functionality and have had it for "quite a while", but I don't see it myself so couldn't test it.

But yeah, groups in Pixelfed have been "just around the corner" for a while now.