a-man-from-earth

joined 2 years ago
[–] a-man-from-earth@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Because it has real, live actors. It not all CG.

[–] a-man-from-earth@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

/r/Reaper (55k) is still restricted.

[–] a-man-from-earth@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Voornamelijk de jongeren die opgroeien in refodorpen in Zeeland, de Veluwe, enzo. En refogezinnen hebben nog steeds meer kinderen dan gemiddeld.

[–] a-man-from-earth@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

That's not what was asked for.

[–] a-man-from-earth@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

That sounds like the very anti-choice point of view promoted by the Religious Right. Here we support people having choice and using the technology available.

[–] a-man-from-earth@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The link is malformed and just leads back here. Maybe you can post the article here? We're here because we don't like what Reddit has become.

[–] a-man-from-earth@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Thanks for the effort post and giving us food for thought! I wonder tho how many people will just knee-jerk react to the title and downvote without reading the article...

[–] a-man-from-earth@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It was categorically denied (by the top level commenter, and repeated by you) that women had those rights. That is the disinformation that feminism keeps spreading with its propaganda.

Please get up to speed by actually watching the video. Otherwise discussion is useless.

[–] a-man-from-earth@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

You apparently didn't watch the video. Please do so before you spread more disinformation.

Women already did own property, and were able to receive an education, and most definitely were not an untapped resource for labor. As was explained in the video, with evidence given.

Yes, they may not have had the right to vote or to hold public office, but neither did most men. It was the struggle for universal suffrage which gave both men and women the vote.

[–] a-man-from-earth@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago (10 children)

You still haven't given us the definition you're using.

Here's one, from the AskFeminists subreddit:

The Patriarchy is a system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it.

It's easy to see that the last part is simply not true. Ergo, we don't live in a patriarchy.

[–] a-man-from-earth@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

Removed as personal attack.

 

I propose that we take a human rights based approach to men’s rights. That is, treat men as rights-holders. This means governments and other duty-bearers have an obligation to men as rights-holders.

Duty-bearers should apply the PANEL principles when developing their polices and practices. The principles are:

Participation
Accountability
Non-discrimination and equality
Empowerment
Legality

This video is based on work by the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, the Scottish Human Rights Commission, and the Danish Institute for Human Rights.

 

Our society doesn’t respect the bodily autonomy of our boys and men, and it doesn’t emphasize getting their consent. Yet we're demanding that they respect the bodily autonomy of others.

 

Notes for a talk at ICMI with the following title: Feminism: Not “progressive”. Not “egalitarian”. Not “liberal”. Not “left-wing”.

  1. Feminism is not “progressive”: It’s regressive; it is based on misandry, sexist discrimination, hate & bias; it suppresses science (esp. on domestic violence, on female violence and on criminology in general); it is conspiracist; it asserts the existence of a non-existent entity “Patriarchy”; it is ultra-conservative, in its treating women as helpless infants. Infantilism about women is conservative, not progressive.

  2. Feminism is not “egalitarian”: It demands, and achieves, preferential treatment for a privileged group (women). By definition, this is anti-egalitarian.

  3. Feminism is not “liberal”: To the contrary, it is socially conservative—women are infants, without agency; it is illiberal & authoritarian; it demands increasing state power; it uses the police and institutional power as a tool of social control; it is moralistic & Puritan. More or less by definition, these are central principle of state-enforced illiberalism, social illiberalism and social conservatism.

  4. Feminism is not “left-wing”: It has no interest in economic fairness (esp. those at the bottom of society); it is openly anti-working-class. Marxism and socialism are, by definition, left-wing because their primary concern is with economic exploitation, wage slavery, alienation of the worker, co-erced theft of their labour, and so on. Feminism is, in no way, “left-wing”. Feminism is a form of Identity Politics. This, in general, is an anti-left-wing position. Furthermore, it is a form of Identity Politics closely aligned with the State, policing, punishment and incarceration (so-called carceral feminism). Again, these are not “left-wing”. They have been traditionally right-wing positions for centuries.

The ICMI20 talk is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZQf1JDa28Y&list=PLOXfnai0-o0I8BtOpmjbn_3FGYBHiV64S

 

This OECD research identifies gender inequality, but only when it goes against women. That’s because they literally don’t measure the inequalities that go against men.

view more: ‹ prev next ›