The one on the very right is NVMe.
__dev
they stop selling parts quickly
That's weird. If they stopped making parts how did I get a replacement battery for my fairphone 3?
I prefer my ice medium rare.
I might get downvoted to hell for this but if we silence fascists then isn’t it just a slippery slope to fascism? Unless people explicitly threaten people then most things should be fair game.
Violence is a founding principle of fascism. You can't establish a dictatorship without violence. The ideology is an explicit threat.
but .for_each(|((_, , t), (, _, b))| { ... } just looks like an abomination
It's not so different in python: for ((_, _, t), (_, _, b)) in zip(top, bottom):
Or in C#: .ForEach(((_, _, t), (_, _, b)) => Console.Write(...));
I'm sure that exists, yes. But you can't give the voting key to individual voters, because that can be bought. So you're using the same black-box voting machines with all the same attack vectors (or even worse if they're connected to the internet).
The only way to make voting machines safe is to have them print out the ballot, but at that point they're just very expensive pencils.
Many(most?) older towns did have a town square, many still do in various forms. Though it's not the town square they're about; it's the medium density mixed-use housing.
I don't know finnish, but from the translation the first page says very little about fabric softeners. Barely a title and 3 bullet points. A recommendation against using it for certain fabrics but doesn't actually list them all, or why it's bad. I don't know about you but I wouldn't base my decision making on such little information.
The 2nd link is even worse, being primarily about allergies and chronic diseases, their concerns are about skin irritation. The only takeaway you should be making from this is that fabric softener can reduce or cause skin irritation.
Which consumer agencies? The ones I use all recommend against it.
Consumer Reports recommends against it: https://www.consumerreports.org/appliances/laundry/why-fabric-softener-is-bad-for-your-laundry-a5931009251/
Choice advises against it: https://www.choice.com.au/home-and-living/laundry-and-cleaning/laundry-detergents/buying-guides/fabric-softeners
Wirecutter recommends against it: https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/guides/how-to-do-your-laundry-better/
They need election reform for that to happen.
Sure, but it's not more valuable than $30 + regular price increases for 60+ years. That's what a lifetime membership is.
Lets flip that around: For my own finances $300 is a lot more valuable than $30 for 10 years. So if I'm to expect that the company will go out of business in 10 years or so, I would have been better off paying for the subscription.
Lets also not forget that companies don't take that $300 and responsibly invest it. It gets reinvested in a risky bid to grow the company and get enough people to subscribe in order to pay for your service going forward.
For a ~60 minute confirmation target. It's $0.77 for a 20 minute confirmation target right now. The daily average is $1.03.
And lets not forget that the only reason the price is so low now is because people aren't competing much for those transactions. If people actually used bitcoin to buy games the transaction fee would increase significantly.