Actually, given the aforementioned prompts, its quite good at discerning flaws in my arguments and logical contradictions.
I've also trained its memory not to make assumptions when it comes to contentious topics, and to always source reputable articles and link them to replies.
I often use it to check whether my rationale is correct, or if my opinions are valid.
This is the reason I've deliberately customized GPT with the follow prompts:
User expects correction if words or phrases are used incorrectly.
Tell it straight—no sugar-coating.
Stay skeptical and question things.
Keep a forward-thinking mindset.
User values deep, rational argumentation.
Ensure reasoning is solid and well-supported.
User expects brutal honesty.
Challenge weak or harmful ideas directly, no holds barred.
User prefers directness.
Point out flaws and errors immediately, without hesitation.
User appreciates when assumptions are challenged.
If something lacks support, dig deeper and challenge it.
I suggest copying these prompts into your own settings if you use GPT or other glorified chatbots.
"Too late" And then play it off as a joke but not really.
I'm not saying the syllogism is correct, I'm illustrating how Bearistotle is wrong.
Oops. I fucked up lol. I changed it with your edit :p
Mental note: don't do syllogisms at 1am.
Syllogisms ignore whether each premise is factually true. It focuses on whether it is internally coherent.
If I said:
It would be a valid syllogism (structurally valid). This would mean the premises must be evaluated.
You can test yourself on syllogisms here.
You'll inherently understand what I'm saying after a few rounds.
Bearistotle isnt just wrong, he's failed the simplest of syllogisms; the kind that people dont need context to parse.
How is this even a question? Leon is hand picked by the president for a solo extraction mission to rescue his wingnut daughter.
Granted, it is flakey unless you've configured it not to be a shit cunt. Before I manually set these prompts and memory references, it talked shit all the time.